Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Centre for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe andRare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe andRare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Proteomics. 2022 Sep 30;268:104702. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2022.104702. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
Apolipoprotein knockout (ApoE) and CD57BL/6J mouse models of angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are commonly used in AAA research. However, the similarities and differences in the molecular mechanisms of AAA in these two genotypes have not been reported. In our study, we analyzed proteomics data from ApoE and CD57BL/6J mouse models of Ang II-induced AAA and control mice by LC-MS/MS. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of differentially abundance proteins (DAPs) in the ApoE or CD57BL/6J mouse groups was performed in R software, and infiltration of immune cells in groups was assessed. DAP that showed the same trend in abundance in ApoE and CD57BL/6J mice (S-DAP) were identified and subjected to GO enrichment, KEGG pathway, and connectivity map (CMap) analyses. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of the S-DAP was drawn, the key S-DAP were identified by MCODE, and the transcription factors (TFs) of crucial S-DAP were predicted by iRegulon in Cytoscape. Male ApoE and CD57BL/6J mouse models of Ang II-induced AAA are commonly used in AAA research, and extracellular matrix organization is associated with AAA in both of these models. However, there are some differences between the mechanisms underlying AAA in these two genotypes, and these differences need to be considered when studying AAA and selecting models. SIGNIFICANCE: Our research provided the first insight into the similarity and differential mechanisms of Ang II infused AAA models using ApoE and CD57BL/6J mice. This study might provide the some advises for the selection of Ang II infused AAA models for further AAA researches.
载脂蛋白敲除(ApoE)和 CD57BL/6J 小鼠血管紧张素 II(Ang II)诱导的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)模型常用于 AAA 研究。然而,这两种基因型的 AAA 的分子机制的相似性和差异性尚未报道。在我们的研究中,我们通过 LC-MS/MS 分析了 Ang II 诱导的 ApoE 和 CD57BL/6J 小鼠模型及对照小鼠的蛋白质组学数据。在 R 软件中对 ApoE 或 CD57BL/6J 小鼠组中的差异丰度蛋白(DAP)进行基因集富集分析(GSEA),并评估各组免疫细胞的浸润情况。鉴定出在 ApoE 和 CD57BL/6J 小鼠中丰度呈相同趋势的 DAP(S-DAP),并对其进行 GO 富集、KEGG 通路和连接图谱(CMap)分析。绘制 S-DAP 的蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络,通过 MCODE 识别关键 S-DAP,并在 Cytoscape 中使用 iRegulon 预测关键 S-DAP 的转录因子(TF)。雄性 ApoE 和 CD57BL/6J 小鼠 Ang II 诱导的 AAA 模型常用于 AAA 研究,这两种模型的细胞外基质组织都与 AAA 相关。然而,这两种基因型的 AAA 机制之间存在一些差异,在研究 AAA 和选择模型时需要考虑这些差异。意义:我们的研究首次深入了解了使用 ApoE 和 CD57BL/6J 小鼠的 Ang II 输注 AAA 模型的相似性和差异机制。这项研究可能为进一步的 AAA 研究选择 Ang II 输注 AAA 模型提供一些建议。