Bhuvaneswari Paliki, Vinay C, Uloopi K S, RojaRamya Kakarla S, Chandrasekhar Rayala, Chaitanya Penmatsa
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):322-326. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2382.
To evaluate the retention rate of self-adhering flowable composite as fissure sealant in comparison with the unfilled resin sealant on first permanent molars of 6-9-year-old children.
A 2-arm, split-mouth randomized controlled trial included 100 children of age 6-9 years with completely erupted mandibular first permanent molars. A total of 200 teeth were randomly divided into two groups, group I: self-adhering flowable composite; group II: unfilled resin sealant. Sealants were placed on the mandibular first permanent molars and the children were recalled at 6, 12, and 18 months intervals to evaluate the retention rate. Chi-square test was used to analyze the data.
Self-adhering flowable composite has shown a complete retention rate of 67%, 47%, and 46% at 6, 12, and 18-month intervals, respectively, whereas unfilled resin sealant has shown 41%, 8%, and 5% retention rate at 6, 12, and 18-month intervals, respectively. The difference in the complete sealant retention rates between the groups is found to be statistically highly significant at all the follow-up intervals ( = 0.0004, 0.0001, and 0.0001 at 6, 12, and 18-month intervals, respectively). In both groups, maximum sealant loss occurred between 6 and 12-month intervals. Retention rates were higher at 6 months intervals which were significantly reduced over 18 months intervals.
Self-adhering flowable composite has shown a higher retention rate compared to unfilled resin sealant at all the time intervals. The retention rate of both materials decreased with time. However, the loss of sealant was more with unfilled resin sealant.
In pediatric dental practice, the elimination of a step in restorative dentistry protocol makes a big difference as time is a critical factor in obtaining children's cooperation. The use of self-adhering materials eliminates the step of bonding agent application, which simplifies the restorative protocol and makes the clinical practice effective. Therefore, these self-adhering flowable composite resin materials can be considered fissure sealants in routine clinical practice.
Bhuvaneswari P, Vinay C, Uloopi KS, Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Self-adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in 6-9-year-old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(3):322-326.
评估自粘结可流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭剂在6 - 9岁儿童第一恒磨牙上的保留率,并与未填充树脂封闭剂进行比较。
一项双臂、口内随机对照试验纳入了100名6 - 9岁下颌第一恒磨牙完全萌出的儿童。总共200颗牙齿被随机分为两组,第一组:自粘结可流动复合树脂;第二组:未填充树脂封闭剂。将封闭剂放置在下颌第一恒磨牙上,并在6、12和18个月的间隔时间召回儿童以评估保留率。采用卡方检验分析数据。
自粘结可流动复合树脂在6、12和18个月间隔时的完全保留率分别为67%、47%和46%,而未填充树脂封闭剂在6、12和18个月间隔时的保留率分别为41%、8%和5%。在所有随访间隔中,两组之间封闭剂完全保留率的差异在统计学上具有高度显著性(6个月、12个月和18个月间隔时分别为 = 0.0004、0.0001和0.0001)。在两组中,最大的封闭剂损失发生在6至12个月的间隔内。6个月间隔时的保留率较高,在18个月间隔时显著降低。
在所有时间间隔内,自粘结可流动复合树脂的保留率均高于未填充树脂封闭剂。两种材料的保留率均随时间下降。然而,未填充树脂封闭剂的封闭剂损失更多。
在儿童牙科实践中,由于时间是获得儿童合作的关键因素,因此在修复牙科方案中消除一个步骤会产生很大影响。使用自粘结材料消除了粘结剂应用步骤,简化了修复方案并使临床实践更有效。因此,这些自粘结可流动复合树脂材料在常规临床实践中可被视为窝沟封闭剂。
Bhuvaneswari P, Vinay C, Uloopi KS, 6 - 9岁儿童自粘结可流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭剂的保留情况临床评估:一项随机对照试验。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2022;15(3):322 - 326。