Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD015196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015196.pub2.
Medications with anticholinergic properties are commonly prescribed to older adults with a pre-existing diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment. The cumulative anticholinergic effect of all the medications a person takes is referred to as the anticholinergic burden because of its potential to cause adverse effects. It is possible that a high anticholinergic burden may be a risk factor for further cognitive decline or neuropsychiatric disturbances in people with dementia. Neuropsychiatric disturbances are the most frequent complication of dementia that require hospitalisation, accounting for almost half of admissions; hence, identification of modifiable prognostic factors for these outcomes is crucial. There are various scales available to measure anticholinergic burden but agreement between them is often poor.
Our primary objective was to assess whether anticholinergic burden, as defined at the level of each individual scale, was a prognostic factor for further cognitive decline or neuropsychiatric disturbances in older adults with pre-existing diagnoses of dementia or cognitive impairment. Our secondary objective was to investigate whether anticholinergic burden was a prognostic factor for other adverse clinical outcomes, including mortality, impaired physical function, and institutionalisation.
We searched these databases from inception to 29 November 2021: MEDLINE OvidSP, Embase OvidSP, PsycINFO OvidSP, CINAHL EBSCOhost, and ISI Web of Science Core Collection on ISI Web of Science.
We included prospective and retrospective longitudinal cohort and case-control observational studies, with a minimum of one-month follow-up, which examined the association between an anticholinergic burden measurement scale and the above stated adverse clinical outcomes, in older adults with pre-existing diagnoses of dementia or cognitive impairment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, and undertook data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and GRADE assessment. We summarised risk associations between anticholinergic burden and all clinical outcomes in a narrative fashion. We also evaluated the risk association between anticholinergic burden and mortality using a random-effects meta-analysis. We established adjusted pooled rates for the anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale; then, as an exploratory analysis, established pooled rates on the prespecified association across scales. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 18 studies that met our inclusion criteria (102,684 older adults). Anticholinergic burden was measured using five distinct measurement scales: 12 studies used the ACB scale; 3 studies used the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS); 1 study used the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS); 1 study used the Anticholinergic Effect on Cognition (AEC) Scale; and 2 studies used a list developed by Tune and Egeli. Risk associations between anticholinergic burden and adverse clinical outcomes were highly heterogenous. Four out of 10 (40%) studies reported a significantly increased risk of greater long-term cognitive decline for participants with an anticholinergic burden compared to participants with no or minimal anticholinergic burden. No studies investigated neuropsychiatric disturbance outcomes. One out of four studies (25%) reported a significant association with reduced physical function for participants with an anticholinergic burden versus participants with no or minimal anticholinergic burden. No study (out of one investigating study) reported a significant association between anticholinergic burden and risk of institutionalisation. Six out of 10 studies (60%) found a significantly increased risk of mortality for those with an anticholinergic burden compared to those with no or minimal anticholinergic burden. Pooled analysis of adjusted mortality hazard ratios (HR) measured anticholinergic burden with the ACB scale, and suggested a significantly increased risk of death for those with a high ACB score relative to those with no or minimal ACB scores (HR 1.153, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.030 to 1.292; 4 studies, 48,663 participants). An exploratory pooled analysis of adjusted mortality HRs across anticholinergic burden scales also suggested a significantly increased risk of death for those with a high anticholinergic burden (HR 1.102, 95% CI 1.044 to 1.163; 6 studies, 68,381 participants). Overall GRADE evaluation of results found low- or very low-certainty evidence for all outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is low-certainty evidence that older adults with dementia or cognitive impairment who have a significant anticholinergic burden may be at increased risk of death. No firm conclusions can be drawn for risk of accelerated cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric disturbances, decline in physical function, or institutionalisation.
具有抗胆碱能特性的药物通常开给有痴呆症或认知障碍既往诊断的老年人。由于其潜在的不良反应风险,一个人服用的所有药物的累积抗胆碱能效应被称为抗胆碱能负担。高抗胆碱能负担可能是痴呆症患者认知能力进一步下降或神经精神障碍的一个危险因素。神经精神障碍是痴呆症最常见的需要住院的并发症,占住院人数的近一半;因此,确定这些结果的可改变预后因素至关重要。有各种量表可用于测量抗胆碱能负担,但它们之间的一致性往往较差。
我们的主要目的是评估个体量表水平上的抗胆碱能负担是否是痴呆症或认知障碍既往诊断的老年人认知能力进一步下降或神经精神障碍的预后因素。我们的次要目的是研究抗胆碱能负担是否是其他不良临床结局(包括死亡、身体功能受损和入院)的预后因素。
我们从成立到 2021 年 11 月 29 日检索了这些数据库:MEDLINE OvidSP、Embase OvidSP、PsycINFO OvidSP、CINAHL EBSCOhost 和 ISI Web of Science 核心合集。
我们纳入了前瞻性和回顾性纵向队列和病例对照观察性研究,随访时间至少为一个月,这些研究检查了抗胆碱能负担测量量表与上述不良临床结局之间的关系,研究对象为有痴呆症或认知障碍既往诊断的老年人。
两名综述作者独立评估研究的纳入情况,并进行数据提取、风险偏倚评估和 GRADE 评估。我们以叙述的方式总结了抗胆碱能负担与所有临床结局之间的风险关联。我们还使用随机效应荟萃分析评估了抗胆碱能负担与死亡率之间的风险关联。我们建立了抗胆碱能认知负担(ACB)量表的调整后累积率;然后,作为探索性分析,建立了跨量表的预设关联的累积率。
我们确定了 18 项符合纳入标准的研究(102684 名老年人)。使用了五种不同的测量量表来测量抗胆碱能负担:12 项研究使用了 ACB 量表;3 项研究使用了抗胆碱能风险量表(ARS);1 项研究使用了抗胆碱能药物量表(ADS);1 项研究使用了抗胆碱能对认知的影响量表(AEC);2 项研究使用了 Tune 和 Egeli 开发的列表。抗胆碱能负担与不良临床结局之间的风险关联高度异质。四项研究(40%)报告称,与没有或最小抗胆碱能负担的参与者相比,抗胆碱能负担较高的参与者长期认知能力下降的风险显著增加。没有研究调查神经精神障碍结局。四项研究中有一项(25%)报告称,与没有或最小抗胆碱能负担的参与者相比,抗胆碱能负担较高的参与者身体功能下降的风险显著增加。没有研究(调查研究之一)报告抗胆碱能负担与入院风险之间存在显著关联。六项研究(60%)发现,与没有或最小抗胆碱能负担的参与者相比,抗胆碱能负担较高的参与者死亡风险显著增加。对使用 ACB 量表测量的调整死亡率危害比(HR)的荟萃分析表明,与没有或最小 ACB 评分的参与者相比,高 ACB 评分的参与者死亡风险显著增加(HR 1.153,95%置信区间(CI)为 1.030 至 1.292;4 项研究,48663 名参与者)。对跨抗胆碱能负担量表的调整死亡率 HRs 的探索性荟萃分析也表明,高抗胆碱能负担的参与者死亡风险显著增加(HR 1.102,95%CI 为 1.044 至 1.163;6 项研究,68381 名参与者)。对所有结果的总体 GRADE 评估发现,证据的确定性为低或极低。
有低确定性证据表明,有痴呆症或认知障碍的老年人如果抗胆碱能负担显著,可能死亡风险增加。对于认知能力加速下降、神经精神障碍、身体功能下降或入院的风险,不能得出明确的结论。