Arumugam Pavithra, Ravi Saravanan, Ln Sundaram, Manickam Prasanna, Kanthan Karthik
Department of Anaesthesiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRMIST, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
Asian J Anesthesiol. 2022 Dec 1;60(4):123-130. doi: 10.6859/aja.202212_60(4).0001. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
Adductor canal block (ACB) is a motor sparing block providing analgesia for surgeries involving anterior part of the knee. The aim of our study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ACB to reduce pain in arthroscopic knee surgeries done under spinal anesthesia. Our primary objective was to evaluate the 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during knee flexion, hemodynamics and side effects of the block.
In this prospective randomised controlled trial, 70 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, A and C. Surgeries were done under spinal anesthesia. Group A patients received ACB with 20 mL of 0.5 % ropivacaine using ultrasound postoperatively. Block was not performed in group C. The amount of morphine consumption in PCA pump, duration of analgesia, mean VAS scores at rest and flexion, hemodynamics and adverse effects were monitored.
The average morphine consumption was significantly lesser with a P-value < 0.001 in group A (8.628 ± 2.001 mg) when compared to group C (21.914 ± 5.118 mg). The duration of analgesia was longer in group A (365.71 ± 53.648 min vs. 150.429 ± 22.537 min) with highly significant P-value of < 0.001. Group A patients had significantly decreased VAS scores at rest and knee flexion and better haemodynamic stability.
We conclude that ultrasound-guided ACB resulted in significantly lesser morphine consumption after arthroscopic knee surgeries. ACB prolonged the duration of analgesia with better hemodynamics, lesser VAS pain scores and with no complications.
股内收肌管阻滞(ACB)是一种保留运动功能的阻滞方法,可为涉及膝关节前部的手术提供镇痛。我们研究的目的是评估ACB在减轻脊髓麻醉下膝关节镜手术疼痛方面的镇痛效果。我们的主要目标是评估术后24小时吗啡的消耗量。次要目标是评估静息和膝关节屈曲时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、血流动力学以及阻滞的副作用。
在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,70例行膝关节镜手术的患者被随机分为A组和C组。手术在脊髓麻醉下进行。A组患者术后使用超声引导,给予20 mL 0.5%罗哌卡因进行ACB。C组未进行阻滞。监测PCA泵中吗啡的消耗量、镇痛持续时间、静息和屈曲时的平均VAS评分、血流动力学及不良反应。
与C组(21.914±5.118 mg)相比,A组(8.628±2.001 mg)的平均吗啡消耗量显著减少,P值<0.001。A组的镇痛持续时间更长(365.71±53.648分钟对150.429±22.537分钟),P值<0.001,具有高度显著性。A组患者静息和膝关节屈曲时的VAS评分显著降低,血流动力学稳定性更好。
我们得出结论,超声引导下的ACB可使膝关节镜手术后吗啡消耗量显著减少。ACB延长了镇痛持续时间,血流动力学更好,VAS疼痛评分更低,且无并发症。