Suppr超能文献

混合现实技术在临床技能客观评估中的应用:一项验证研究。

The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, London, W2 1NY, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 23;22(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mixed Reality technology may provide many advantages over traditional teaching methods. Despite its potential, the technology has yet to be used for the formal assessment of clinical competency. This study sought to collect validity evidence and assess the feasibility of using the HoloLens 2 mixed reality headset for the conduct and augmentation of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the assessment of undergraduate medical students undertaking OSCEs via HoloLens 2 live (HLL) and recorded (HLR), and gold-standard in-person (IP) methods. An augmented mixed reality scenario was also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirteen undergraduate participants completed a total of 65 OSCE stations. Overall inter-modality correlation was 0.81 (p = 0.01), 0.98 (p = 0.01) and 0.82 (p = 0.01) for IP vs. HLL, HLL vs. HLR and IP vs. HLR respectively. Skill based correlations for IP vs. HLR were assessed for history taking (0.82, p = 0.01), clinical examination (0.81, p = 0.01), procedural (0.88, p = 0.01) and clinical skills (0.92, p = 0.01), and assessment of a virtual mixed reality patient (0.74, p = 0.01). The HoloLens device was deemed to be usable and practical (Standard Usability Scale (SUS) score = 51.5), and the technology was thought to deliver greater flexibility and convenience, and have the potential to expand and enhance assessment opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

HoloLens 2 is comparable to traditional in-person examination of undergraduate medical students for both live and recorded assessments, and therefore is a valid and robust method for objectively assessing performance. The technology is in its infancy, and users need to develop confidence in its usability and reliability as an assessment tool. However, the potential to integrate additional functionality including holographic content, automated tracking and data analysis, and to facilitate remote assessment may allow the technology to enhance, expand and standardise examinations across a range of educational contexts.

摘要

背景

混合现实技术可能比传统教学方法提供更多优势。尽管它具有潜力,但该技术尚未用于临床能力的正式评估。本研究旨在收集有效性证据,并评估使用 HoloLens 2 混合现实耳机进行和增强客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的可行性。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以比较通过 HoloLens 2 现场(HLL)和记录(HLR)以及金标准的亲自(IP)方法评估本科医学生的 OSCE。还评估了一个增强的混合现实场景。

结果

十三名本科参与者共完成了 65 个 OSCE 站。总体而言,模态间相关性分别为 IP 与 HLL(0.81,p=0.01)、HLL 与 HLR(0.98,p=0.01)和 IP 与 HLR(0.82,p=0.01)。针对 IP 与 HLR,历史采集(0.82,p=0.01)、临床检查(0.81,p=0.01)、程序(0.88,p=0.01)和临床技能(0.92,p=0.01)以及虚拟混合现实患者的评估(0.74,p=0.01)的技能相关性进行了评估。HoloLens 设备被认为是可用且实用的(标准可用性量表(SUS)评分=51.5),并且该技术被认为提供了更大的灵活性和便利性,并且具有扩展和增强评估机会的潜力。

结论

HoloLens 2 与传统的本科医学生亲自考试一样,可用于现场和记录评估,因此是一种客观评估表现的有效且强大的方法。该技术仍处于起步阶段,用户需要对其作为评估工具的可用性和可靠性建立信心。然而,将附加功能(包括全息内容、自动跟踪和数据分析)集成并促进远程评估的潜力可能使该技术能够在一系列教育环境中增强、扩展和标准化考试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7029/9396902/f5532bd637fc/12909_2022_3701_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验