Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5506-e5514. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13974. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Quality oral self-care is a key element in maintaining oral health, which is important for students' general health, their overall well-being and learning. The cluster randomised controlled trial tested the following hypotheses: (1) self-determination theory (SDT)-guided dental education is superior to conventional dental instruction in modifying oral self-care in adolescents; (2) after the discontinued dental education, improved oral self-care is only maintained for short rather than long term and (3) multiple predictors explain variations in adolescents' oral self-care at different observation periods. The intervention group (N = 97) received three face-to-face educational sessions to facilitate adolescents' intrinsic motivation, while the control group (N = 99) had one conventional dental instruction session. Dental plaque scores (% of tooth area covered by dental plaque) indicated a lack of oral self-care. Linear multivariable models tested the following predictors of oral self-care at different observation periods: socio-demographics (sex, socio-economic status, school) and self-determination attributes (autonomy, relatedness, competence). Results indicated that from baseline to the 6-month follow-up, dental plaque scores decreased (oral self-care improved) in the intervention group but not in the control group. At the 12-month follow-up point, there were no significant differences in mean plaque scores between the study groups. Baseline plaque levels (β = 0.807), the type of dental instruction (theory guided vs. conventional) (β = 0.208), relatedness (β = 0.106) and competence (β = 0.102) were significant predictors that explained 67.6% of the variance in dental plaque scores at the 12-month follow-up point. The theory-guided education was superior to conventional verbal instruction in improving adolescent oral self-care; however, this improvement was only maintained short term. Variations in adolescent oral self-care at short- and long-term observation points were explained by baseline oral self-care levels and two SDT components: relatedness and competence.
口腔自我保健质量是维护口腔健康的关键因素,对学生的整体健康、整体幸福感和学习都很重要。这项整群随机对照试验检验了以下假设:(1)自我决定理论(SDT)指导的口腔健康教育在改善青少年口腔自我保健方面优于传统口腔指导;(2)在停止口腔教育后,改善的口腔自我保健仅能维持短期,而不能维持长期;(3)多个预测因子可以解释青少年在不同观察期的口腔自我保健的变化。干预组(N=97)接受了三次面对面的教育课程,以促进青少年的内在动机,而对照组(N=99)接受了一次传统的口腔指导课程。牙菌斑评分(%的牙齿面积被牙菌斑覆盖)表明口腔自我保健不足。线性多变量模型检验了不同观察期口腔自我保健的以下预测因子:社会人口统计学因素(性别、社会经济地位、学校)和自我决定属性(自主性、关联性、胜任力)。结果表明,从基线到 6 个月的随访期,干预组的牙菌斑评分下降(口腔自我保健改善),而对照组则没有。在 12 个月的随访点,两组的平均菌斑评分没有显著差异。基线菌斑水平(β=0.807)、口腔指导类型(理论指导与传统)(β=0.208)、关联性(β=0.106)和胜任力(β=0.102)是解释 12 个月随访点牙菌斑评分方差的重要预测因子,解释了 67.6%的方差。理论指导教育在改善青少年口腔自我保健方面优于传统的口头指导,但这种改善仅能维持短期。青少年短期和长期观察点的口腔自我保健变化由基线口腔自我保健水平和 SDT 的两个组成部分解释:关联性和胜任力。