Suppr超能文献

英国基于模拟的教育中模拟参与者安全检查表的内容效度测试:一种方法学研究。

Content validity test of a safety checklist for simulated participants in simulation-based education in the United Kingdom: a methodological study.

机构信息

The University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust Simulation Services, Bristol, UK

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:21. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.21. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Simulation training is an ever-growing means of healthcare education and often involves simulated participants (SPs), commonly known as actors. Simulation-based education (SBE) can sometimes endanger SPs, and as such we have created a safety checklist for them to follow. This study describes how we developed the checklist through a quality improvement project, and then evaluated feedback responses to assess whether SPs felt our checklist was safe.

METHODS

The checklist was provided to SPs working in an acute trust simulation service when delivering multidisciplinary SBE over 4 months. Using multiple plan–do–study–act cycles, the checklist was refined by reflecting on SP feedback to ensure that the standards of the safe simulation were met. We collected 21 responses from September to December 2021 after SPs completed an SBE event.

RESULTS

The responses showed that 100% of SPs felt safe during SBE when using our checklist. The average “confidence in safety” rating before using the checklist was 6.8/10, which increased significantly to 9.2/10 after using the checklist (P<0.0005). The checklist was refined throughout the 4 months and implemented in adult and pediatric SBE as a standard operating procedure.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using our safety checklist as a standard operating procedure to improve the confidence and safety of SPs during safe and effective simulations.

摘要

目的

模拟培训是医疗保健教育不断发展的手段,通常涉及模拟参与者(SP),通常称为演员。基于模拟的教育(SBE)有时会危及 SP,因此我们为他们创建了一个安全检查表以供遵循。本研究描述了我们如何通过一个质量改进项目来开发检查表,然后评估反馈响应,以评估 SP 是否认为我们的检查表是安全的。

方法

在 4 个月内提供给在急性信托模拟服务中工作的 SP,在进行多学科 SBE 时使用该检查表。通过多次计划-执行-研究-行动循环,通过反映 SP 的反馈来完善检查表,以确保满足安全模拟的标准。我们在 2021 年 9 月至 12 月期间收集了 21 名 SP 在完成 SBE 事件后的响应。

结果

响应表明,100%的 SP 在使用我们的检查表进行 SBE 时感到安全。使用检查表前的“安全信心”平均评分为 6.8/10,使用检查表后显著增加至 9.2/10(P<0.0005)。检查表在 4 个月内得到了完善,并作为标准操作程序在成人和儿科 SBE 中实施。

结论

我们建议将安全检查表用作标准操作程序,以提高 SP 在安全有效的模拟过程中的信心和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验