Suppr超能文献

SAGES安全胆囊切除术模块改善执业外科医生的判断力:一项随机对照试验的结果

SAGES safe cholecystectomy modules improve practicing surgeons' judgment: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Weis Joshua, Brunt L Michael, Madani Amin, Telem Dana, Nagaraj Madhuri, Asbun Horacio, Davis Brian R, Dissanaike Sharmila, Ujiki Michael B, Westcott Carl J, Alseidi Adnan

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.

Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):862-870. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09503-4. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, major bile duct injury (BDI) rates during this operation remain unacceptably high. In October 2018, SAGES released the Safe Cholecystectomy modules, which define specific strategies to minimize the risk of BDI. This study aims to investigate whether this curriculum can change the knowledge and behaviors of surgeons in practice.

METHODS

Practicing surgeons were recruited from the membership of SAGES and the American College of Surgeons Advisory Council for Rural Surgery. All participants completed a baseline assessment (pre-test) that involved interpreting cholangiograms, troubleshooting difficult cases, and managing BDI. Participants' dissection strategies during cholecystectomy were also compared to the strategies of a panel of 15 experts based on accuracy scores using the Think Like a Surgeon validated web-based platform. Participants were then randomized to complete the Safe Cholecystectomy modules (Safe Chole module group) or participate in usually scheduled CME activities (control group). Both groups completed repeat assessments (post-tests) one month after randomization.

RESULTS

Overall, 41 participants were eligible for analysis, including 18 Safe Chole module participants and 23 controls. The two groups had no significant differences in pre-test scores. However, at post-test, Safe Chole module participants made significantly fewer errors managing BDI and interpreting cholangiograms. Safe Chole module participants were less likely to convert to an open operation on the post-test than controls when facing challenging dissections. However, Safe Chole module participants displayed a similar incidence of errors when evaluating adequate critical views of safety.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized-controlled trial, the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy modules improved surgeons' abilities to interpret cholangiograms and safely manage BDI. Additionally, surgeons who studied the modules were less likely to convert to open during difficult dissections. These data show the power of the Safe Cholecystectomy modules to affect practicing surgeons' behaviors in a measurable and meaningful way.

摘要

背景

尽管腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有诸多优势,但该手术过程中主要胆管损伤(BDI)的发生率仍然高得令人无法接受。2018年10月,美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会(SAGES)发布了安全胆囊切除术模块,其中定义了将BDI风险降至最低的具体策略。本研究旨在调查该课程是否能改变外科医生在实际操作中的知识和行为。

方法

从SAGES成员以及美国外科医师学会农村外科咨询委员会中招募执业外科医生。所有参与者都完成了一项基线评估(预测试),包括解读胆管造影、解决疑难病例以及处理BDI。还使用“像外科医生一样思考”经过验证的基于网络的平台,根据准确性评分,将参与者在胆囊切除术中的解剖策略与由15名专家组成的小组的策略进行比较。然后,参与者被随机分为完成安全胆囊切除术模块(安全胆囊模块组)或参加常规安排的继续医学教育活动(对照组)。两组在随机分组后一个月都完成了重复评估(后测试)。

结果

总体而言,41名参与者符合分析条件,其中包括18名安全胆囊模块参与者和23名对照组。两组在预测试分数上没有显著差异。然而,在后测试中,安全胆囊模块参与者在处理BDI和解读胆管造影时犯的错误明显更少。在面对具有挑战性的解剖时,安全胆囊模块参与者在后测试中转为开放手术的可能性低于对照组。然而,在评估足够的安全关键视野时,安全胆囊模块参与者显示出相似的错误发生率。

结论

在这项随机对照试验中,SAGES安全胆囊切除术模块提高了外科医生解读胆管造影和安全处理BDI的能力。此外,学习这些模块的外科医生在困难解剖时转为开放手术的可能性较小。这些数据表明了安全胆囊切除术模块以可衡量且有意义的方式影响执业外科医生行为的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验