Mullins Karen, Filan David, Carton Patrick
UPMC Sports Medicine Clinic, WIT Arena, Waterford, Ireland.
The Hip and Groin Clinic, UPMC Whitfield, Butlerstown North, Waterford, Ireland.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 22;4(4):e1557-e1573. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.05.002. eCollection 2022 Aug.
To examine the efficacy of biologic agents in the treatment of cartilage defects associated with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).
PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers for eligible studies. We included randomized and nonrandomized control trials as well as uncontrolled case series and retrospective studies. Studies were excluded if they included injections of corticosteroids, papers that described technique only, review papers, and those not in the English language. Demographics, treatment type, outcome of treatment, and complications were extracted, whereas risk of bias and study quality were assessed independently using the risk of bias tool (ROB2) and effective public health practice project tool. A narrative synthesis was performed, and standardized mean differences were reported. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Eighteen studies consisting of 1,024 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three studies involved the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an adjuvant to surgery and were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies administered hyaluronic acid (HA) as a primary treatment. Twelve involved various cell-based methods of chondrocyte stimulation for cartilage defects associated with FAI, but heterogeneity did not allow for pooling. Low-quality evidence indicates PRP is not associated with improved outcomes following surgery (mean difference -1.42, 95% confidence interval -3.95 to 1.11, = .27). Very-low-quality evidence suggests HA (standardized mean difference 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.64-1.66, < .001, Z = 4.39) and cell-based therapies may improve function and pain in patients with FAI.
Low-quality evidence indicates PRP is not associated with improved outcomes following hip FAI surgery, and very-low-quality evidence suggests HA and cell-based therapies may improve outcomes.
systematic review of Level I-V studies.
探讨生物制剂治疗与股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)相关的软骨损伤的疗效。
由2名独立审阅者检索PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和Cochrane系统评价数据库,以查找符合条件的研究。我们纳入了随机对照试验和非随机对照试验,以及无对照的病例系列研究和回顾性研究。如果研究包括皮质类固醇注射、仅描述技术的论文、综述论文以及非英文论文,则将其排除。提取人口统计学信息、治疗类型、治疗结果和并发症,同时使用偏倚风险工具(ROB2)和有效的公共卫生实践项目工具独立评估偏倚风险和研究质量。进行叙述性综合分析,并报告标准化均数差值。使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。
18项研究(共1024例患者)符合纳入标准。3项研究涉及使用富血小板血浆(PRP)作为手术辅助手段,并纳入荟萃分析。3项研究将透明质酸(HA)作为主要治疗方法。12项研究涉及各种基于细胞的软骨细胞刺激方法,用于治疗与FAI相关的软骨损伤,但由于异质性无法进行合并分析。低质量证据表明PRP与手术后改善的结果无关(均数差值-1.42,95%置信区间-3.95至1.11,P = 0.27)。极低质量证据表明HA(标准化均数差值1.15,95%置信区间0.64 - 1.66,P < 0.001,Z = 4.39)和基于细胞的疗法可能改善FAI患者的功能和疼痛。
低质量证据表明PRP与髋关节FAI手术后改善的结果无关,极低质量证据表明HA和基于细胞的疗法可能改善结果。
I - V级研究的系统评价。