Zhang Ruiguo, Zhang Wenxin, Wu Cailan, Jia Qiang, Chai Jinyan, Meng Zhaowei, Zheng Wei, Tan Jian
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 12;12:955629. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955629. eCollection 2022.
Population-based estimates of the incidence and prognosis of bone metastases (BM) stratified by histologic subtype at diagnosis of thyroid cancer are limited.
Using multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses, we identified risk factors for BM and investigated the prognostic survival of BM patients between 2010 and 2015 the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Among 64,083 eligible patients, a total of 347 patients with BM at the time of diagnosis were identified, representing 0.5% of the entire cohort but 32.4% of the subset with metastases. BM incidence was highest (11.6%) in anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), which, nevertheless, was highest (61.5%) in follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) among the subset with metastases. The median overall survival among BM patients was 40.0 months, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 65.2%, 51.3%, and 38.7%, respectively. Compared with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), FTC (aOR, 6.33; 95% CI, 4.72-8.48), medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) (aOR, 6.04, 95% CI, 4.09-8.92), and ATC (aOR, 6.21; 95% CI, 4.20-9.18) significantly increased the risk of developing BM. However, only ATC (aHR, 6.07; 95% CI, 3.83-9.60) was independently associated with worse survival in multivariable analysis. Additionally, patients with BM alone (56.5%) displayed the longest median survival (66.0 months), compared with those complicated with one extraskeletal metastatic site (lung, brain, or liver) (35.2%; 14.0 months) and two or three sites (8.3%; 6.0 months). The former 5-year overall survival rate was 52.6%, which, however, drastically declined to 23.0% in patients with one extraskeletal metastatic site and 9.1% with two or three sites.
Closer bone surveillance should be required for patients with FTC, MTC, and ATC, and extraskeletal metastases at initial diagnosis frequently predict a poorer prognosis.
基于人群对甲状腺癌诊断时按组织学亚型分层的骨转移(BM)发病率和预后的估计有限。
我们使用多变量逻辑回归和Cox回归分析,在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定了BM的危险因素,并调查了2010年至2015年间BM患者的预后生存情况。
在64,083名符合条件的患者中,共识别出347名诊断时患有BM的患者,占整个队列的0.5%,但占转移亚组的32.4%。间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)的BM发病率最高(11.6%),不过,在有转移的亚组中,滤泡状甲状腺癌(FTC)的BM发病率最高(61.5%)。BM患者的中位总生存期为40.0个月,1年、3年和5年生存率分别为65.2%、51.3%和38.7%。与乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)相比,FTC(调整后比值比[aOR],6.33;95%置信区间[CI],4.72 - 8.48)、髓样甲状腺癌(MTC)(aOR,6.04,95% CI,4.09 - 8.92)和ATC(aOR,6.21;95% CI,4.20 - 9.18)显著增加了发生BM的风险。然而,在多变量分析中,只有ATC(调整后风险比[aHR],6.07;95% CI,3.83 - 9.60)与较差的生存独立相关。此外,单纯BM患者(56.5%)的中位生存期最长(66.0个月),相比之下,合并一个骨外转移部位(肺、脑或肝)的患者(35.2%;14.0个月)以及合并两个或三个部位的患者(8.3%;6.0个月)。前者的5年总生存率为52.6%,然而,在有一个骨外转移部位的患者中急剧下降至23.0%,在有两个或三个部位的患者中为9.1%。
FTC、MTC和ATC患者应进行更密切的骨监测,初始诊断时的骨外转移通常预示预后较差。