Langer Thorsten, Gusset Nicole, Pechmann Astrid, Stumpe Eva, Dürr Susanne, Mund Annette, Matilainen Julia, Meyer Sylvia, Barth Michael, Haddad Anneke
Klinik für Neuropädiatrie und Muskelerkrankungen, Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
SMA Schweiz, Heimberg, Schweiz.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Sep;173:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
Participation of patients and relatives in research means that those affected are involved in the research process in a partnership role. Despite the growing importance of participatory approaches and the large number of available concepts, many researchers and patients are faced with the question of how participatory research can be realized and organized in concrete terms. Here we report on our experiences with two different forms of patient participation in research in the context of pediatric health care research at a university hospital: (1) In a project for the development and evaluation of a case management for patients with spinal muscular atrophy, patient representatives have an consultative role. (2) In the patient advisory board, which is to accompany the research activities of the research group at the site continuously and systematically, i.e. in all phases, the participation currently corresponds to a contributory role (involvement) which, in the future, could be moved onto the collaborative stage. In both forms of participation, the essential questions include the selection of the participating patients, the type and extent of participation, and the evaluation of the effect of participation on the research that is carried out. In our experience, both forms of participation add value to research from the perspective of all participants. At the same time, they bring different opportunities and challenges. While in project-based participation the sphere of influence is already delineated by researchers, the context of the patient advisory board provides more room and openness to develop, for example, a research agenda and thus identify new research topics. In our experience, however, sufficient resources (in terms of time and money) are required from all participants, as well as good, trusting cooperation with jointly developed processes to realize both forms of participation.
患者及亲属参与研究意味着受影响者以伙伴关系参与研究过程。尽管参与式方法的重要性日益凸显且有大量可用概念,但许多研究人员和患者仍面临如何切实实现和组织参与式研究的问题。在此,我们报告在大学医院儿科医疗研究背景下患者参与研究的两种不同形式的经验:(1)在一项针对脊髓性肌萎缩症患者病例管理的开发与评估项目中,患者代表发挥咨询作用。(2)在患者咨询委员会中,该委员会将持续且系统地,即在所有阶段伴随研究小组的研究活动,目前的参与对应一种贡献性角色(参与),未来可能会进入合作阶段。在这两种参与形式中,关键问题包括参与患者的选择、参与的类型和程度,以及对参与对所开展研究的影响的评估。根据我们的经验,从所有参与者的角度来看,这两种参与形式都为研究增添了价值。同时,它们带来了不同的机遇和挑战。在基于项目的参与中,影响范围已由研究人员划定,而患者咨询委员会的背景提供了更多空间和开放性来制定,例如,研究议程并从而确定新的研究课题。然而,根据我们的经验,所有参与者都需要足够的资源(在时间和资金方面),以及与共同制定的流程进行良好、互信的合作,以实现这两种参与形式。