Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road (M), Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
SonoScape Medical Corporation, Shenzhen, China.
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Feb;34(2):545-551. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05341-z. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
This study was aimed at describing the morphological characteristics of the normal female anal sphincter complex (ASC) by high-resolution transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS).
Thirty volunteers, including 19 nulliparous and 11 women who had only given birth by Cesarean section, were recruited. The ASC was shown in a set of five slices by EAUS and 8 slices by TPUS. EAUS slices 1 and 5 matched TPUS slices 1 and 8; EAUS slices 2, 3, and 4 were approximately at the levels of TPUS slices 3, 5, and 7. The anterior and lateral EAS and IAS thicknesses were measured and the two methods were compared.
The median age was 29 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 20.6 kg/m. All measured values obtained by TPUS were normally distributed. The EAS thickness on EAUS slice 2 and the IAS thickness on EAUS slices 2 and 3 were not normally distributed. The mean anterior EAS thickness was 2.51 mm, 2.96 mm, and 3.53 mm in slices 3, 5, and 7 on TPUS and was significantly thinner than that in slices 2 (2.62 mm), 3 (3.77 mm), and 4 (4.62 mm) on EAUS. In contrast, the IAS was markedly thicker on TPUS. The ratio of sphincter thickness anteriorly to laterally was similar using the two methods.
The morphological characteristics of EAS shown by TPUS and EAUS were similar. EAS was thinner, and IAS was thicker on TPUS. The IAS seems to be distorted on endoanal imaging.
本研究旨在通过高分辨率经会阴超声(TPUS)和经肛门超声(EAUS)描述正常女性肛门括约肌复合体(ASC)的形态特征。
招募了 30 名志愿者,包括 19 名未产妇和 11 名仅行剖宫产分娩的妇女。EAUS 显示 ASC 共 5 个层面,TPUS 显示 8 个层面。EAUS 层面 1 和 5 与 TPUS 层面 1 和 8 相对应;EAUS 层面 2、3 和 4 大致相当于 TPUS 层面 3、5 和 7。测量前、外侧外括约肌(EAS)和内括约肌(IAS)的厚度,并比较两种方法。
中位年龄为 29 岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为 20.6 kg/m²。所有通过 TPUS 测量的值均呈正态分布。EAS 厚度在 EAUS 层面 2 上和 IAS 厚度在 EAUS 层面 2 和 3 上均未呈正态分布。TPUS 层面 3、5 和 7 上的前 EAS 平均厚度分别为 2.51、2.96 和 3.53 mm,明显小于 EAUS 层面 2(2.62 mm)、3(3.77 mm)和 4(4.62 mm)上的厚度。相比之下,IAS 在 TPUS 上明显更厚。两种方法测量的括约肌厚度前侧与后侧的比值相似。
TPUS 和 EAUS 显示的 EAS 形态特征相似。EAS 在 TPUS 上更薄,IAS 在 TPUS 上更厚。IAS 在经肛门成像上似乎变形。