Suppr超能文献

电子医疗保健服务(eMedCare)出了什么问题?对两个农村地区初级保健中 IT 项目的形成性评估。

What Went Wrong in eMedCare? Formative Evaluation of an IT Project in Primary Care in Two Rural Districts.

机构信息

Health Informatics Research Group, Osnabrück University of AS, Germany.

Nursing Science, Osnabrück University of AS, Germany.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Aug 17;296:81-89. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220807.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The interaction between nurses and physicians in the primary care setting is challenging with regard to structural, process and technical barriers. In order to overcome these barriers, the eMedCare project was launched and a commercial system was implemented.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at a formative evaluation of the project. The findings should be used retrospectively to understand the failure of the project.

METHODS

To this end, two rounds of qualitative interviews with 10 respectively 8 healthcare providers were performed.

RESULTS

The interviews revealed a mixed benefit. Difficulties arose because the initial aim to monitor patients shifted towards improving the communication between the providers, partly due to the poor usability of the monitoring system. Additional workload was imposed because the system was not interoperable with the institutional IT systems.

CONCLUSION

Projects with an unclear or shifting vision and focus seem to be susceptible to failure. The secure communication applications could have been realised on the intended scale if the national Telematikinfrastruktur had been in place.

摘要

简介

在初级保健环境中,护士和医生之间的互动在结构、过程和技术方面存在挑战。为了克服这些障碍,启动了 eMedCare 项目并实施了一个商业系统。

目的

本研究旨在对项目进行形成性评估。研究结果应被回顾性地用于了解项目的失败原因。

方法

为此,对 10 名和 8 名医疗保健提供者进行了两轮定性访谈。

结果

访谈结果显示出混合效益。由于最初监测患者的目的转向改善提供者之间的沟通,部分原因是监测系统的可用性较差,因此出现了困难。由于系统与机构的 IT 系统不兼容,因此增加了额外的工作量。

结论

愿景和重点不明确或转移的项目似乎容易失败。如果国家 Telematikinfrastruktur 到位,安全通信应用程序本可以按预期规模实现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验