Suppr超能文献

种植体周围炎治疗前的亚边缘仪器处理效果:一项多中心随机临床试验。

Effect of sub-marginal instrumentation before surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A multi-centre randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Section of Post-graduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Dec;49(12):1334-1345. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13713. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

Abstract

AIM

The present multi-centre randomized clinical trial with 12 months of follow-up aimed at studying the added effect of sub-marginal instrumentation before surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis were recruited. After a behavioural intervention phase including oral hygiene instructions, patients were randomized to either receiving supra- and sub-marginal instrumentation on their affected implants (control group: 21 patients and 29 implants) or only supra-marginal instrumentation (test group: 21 patients and 24 implants), before undergoing surgery. Changes in the deepest probing pocket depth (PPD) with respect to baseline and a composite outcome of treatment success (no implant loss, no bone loss > 0.5 mm, no bleeding or suppuration on probing [BoP/SoP], and PPD ≤ 5 mm) at the 12-month examination were regarded as the primary outcomes of the trial.

RESULTS

At the 12-month examination, changes in the deepest PPD with respect to baseline amounted to -2.96 mm in the control group and to -3.11 mm in the test one (MD = -0.16; SE = 0.56; p = .769), while 21.4% of the implants in the control group and 33.3% in the test group presented treatment success (OR = 1.83; SE = 1.15; p = .338). With the exception of a longer non-surgical treatment duration in the control group (differences in  = -14.29 min; SE = 2.91; p < .001), no other secondary (e.g., soft-tissue recession, keratinized mucosa height, and bone level changes, as well as BoP, SoP, profuse bleeding and implant loss rates) or exploratory (i.e., early wound healing, aesthetics, surgical and total treatment duration, surgery difficulty, intra-operative bleeding, and adverse events) outcome demonstrated statistically significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present multi-centre randomized clinical trial did not demonstrate an added effect of performing sub-marginal instrumentation 6 weeks before the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Larger clinical trials are however needed to confirm the present findings (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03620331).

摘要

目的

本多中心随机临床试验随访时间为 12 个月,旨在研究在治疗种植体周围炎时,手术前进行亚边缘仪器处理的附加效果。

材料和方法

招募了 42 名被诊断患有种植体周围炎的患者。在包括口腔卫生指导的行为干预阶段后,患者被随机分为接受受影响种植体的上下边缘仪器处理(对照组:21 名患者和 29 个种植体)或仅接受上边缘仪器处理(实验组:21 名患者和 24 个种植体),然后进行手术。以基线时最深探诊袋深度(PPD)的变化和治疗成功的综合结果(无种植体丧失、无骨丧失>0.5mm、探诊时无出血或溢脓[BoP/SoP]和 PPD≤5mm)作为试验的主要结果。

结果

在 12 个月的检查中,对照组最深 PPD 相对于基线的变化为-2.96mm,实验组为-3.11mm(MD=-0.16;SE=0.56;p=0.769),而对照组中有 21.4%的种植体和实验组中有 33.3%的种植体治疗成功(OR=1.83;SE=1.15;p=0.338)。除了对照组的非手术治疗时间较长(差异为=14.29 分钟;SE=2.91;p<0.001)外,其他次要(如软组织退缩、角化黏膜高度和骨水平变化,以及 BoP、SoP、大量出血和种植体丧失率)或探索性(如早期伤口愈合、美学、手术和总治疗时间、手术难度、术中出血和不良事件)结果在组间均无统计学差异。

结论

本多中心随机临床试验未显示在种植体周围炎手术治疗前 6 周进行亚边缘仪器处理的附加效果。然而,需要更大的临床试验来证实目前的发现(Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03620331)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f912/9826024/2c17996f8550/JCPE-49-1334-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验