Suppr超能文献

区分跑步机行走和地面行走时身体运动学的物理因素。

Physical factors that differentiate body kinematics between treadmill and overground walking.

作者信息

Jung Mingi, Koo Seungbum

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Aug 26;10:888691. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.888691. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Treadmills are widely used in rehabilitation and gait analysis. However, previous studies have reported differences in terms of kinematics and kinetics between treadmill and overground walking due to physical and psychological factors. The aim of this study was to analyze gait differences due to only the physical factors of treadmill walking. Walking motions of a male participant were captured at 0.63, 1.05, 1.33, and 3.91 m/s. A gait controller of a virtual subject (63 kg) was trained for ground walking at each walking speed a reinforcement learning method. Additionally, the gait controllers of virtual subjects with different body masses of 47, 79, and 94 kg were trained for ground walking at 1.05 m/s. The gait controllers and virtual subjects were tested for treadmill walking, and their lower-limb joint kinematics were compared with those for ground walking. Treadmill conditions of maximum allowable belt force and feedback control frequency of belt speed were set between 100 and 500 N and between 10 and 50 Hz, respectively. The lower-limb kinematics were identical between the two conditions regardless of the body mass and walking speed when the belt could provide a constant speed regardless of external perturbation in the ideal treadmill. However, kinematic differences were observed when simulation was performed on a non-ideal treadmill with a relatively low belt force and control frequency of belt speed. The root-mean-square differences of the hip, knee, and ankle flexion angles between treadmill and overground running at 3.91 m/s increased by 3.76°, 3.73°, and 4.91°, respectively, when the maximum belt force and control frequency decreased from infinity to 100 N and 10 Hz, respectively. At a maximum belt force exceeding 400 N or a control frequency exceeding 25 Hz, the root-mean-square difference of the joint kinematics was less than 3° for all body masses and walking speeds. Virtual subjects walking on non-ideal treadmills showed different joint kinematics from ground walking. The study identified physical factors that differentiate treadmill walking from overground walking, and suggested the belt forces and control frequencies of a treadmill to achieve the desired limit of kinematic differences.

摘要

跑步机在康复和步态分析中被广泛应用。然而,先前的研究报告称,由于身体和心理因素,跑步机行走和地面行走在运动学和动力学方面存在差异。本研究的目的是仅分析跑步机行走的身体因素导致的步态差异。以0.63、1.05、1.33和3.91米/秒的速度捕捉一名男性参与者的行走动作。使用强化学习方法,针对每个行走速度训练虚拟受试者(63千克)的地面行走步态控制器。此外,针对体重分别为47、79和94千克的不同虚拟受试者的步态控制器,在1.05米/秒的速度下训练其地面行走。对步态控制器和虚拟受试者进行跑步机行走测试,并将其下肢关节运动学与地面行走的情况进行比较。跑步机的最大允许皮带力和皮带速度反馈控制频率的条件分别设置在100至500牛和10至50赫兹之间。在理想跑步机中,当皮带能够在不受外部干扰的情况下提供恒定速度时,无论体重和行走速度如何,两种情况下的下肢运动学都是相同的。然而,在皮带力相对较低且皮带速度控制频率较低的非理想跑步机上进行模拟时,观察到了运动学差异。当最大皮带力和控制频率分别从无穷大降至100牛和10赫兹时,跑步机行走和以3.91米/秒速度地面跑步时,髋、膝和踝关节屈曲角度的均方根差异分别增加了3.76°、3.73°和4.91°。在最大皮带力超过400牛或控制频率超过25赫兹时,所有体重和行走速度下关节运动学的均方根差异均小于3°。在非理想跑步机上行走的虚拟受试者表现出与地面行走不同的关节运动学。该研究确定了区分跑步机行走和地面行走的身体因素,并提出了跑步机的皮带力和控制频率,以实现所需的运动学差异极限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a9/9458960/21a540347661/fbioe-10-888691-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验