Orth Linda, Meeh Johanna, Gur Ruben C, Neuner Irene, Sarkheil Pegah
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 24;16:933718. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.933718. eCollection 2022.
Dysregulated frontostriatal circuitries are viewed as a common target for the treatment of aberrant behaviors in various psychiatric and neurological disorders. Accordingly, experimental neurofeedback paradigms have been applied to modify the frontostriatal circuitry. The human frontostriatal circuitry is topographically and functionally organized into the "limbic," the "associative," and the "motor" subsystems underlying a variety of affective, cognitive, and motor functions. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding functional magnetic resonance imaging-based neurofeedback studies that targeted brain activations within the frontostriatal circuitry. Seventy-nine published studies were included in our survey. We assessed the efficacy of these studies in terms of imaging findings of neurofeedback intervention as well as behavioral and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the neurofeedback targets of the studies could be assigned to the identifiable frontostriatal subsystems. The majority of studies that targeted frontostriatal circuitry functions focused on the anterior cingulate cortex, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the supplementary motor area. Only a few studies ( = 14) targeted the connectivity of the frontostriatal regions. However, analyses of connectivity changes were reported in more cases ( = 32). Neurofeedback has been frequently used to modify brain activations within the frontostriatal circuitry. Given the regulatory mechanisms within the closed loop of the frontostriatal circuitry, the connectivity-based neurofeedback paradigms should be primarily considered for modifications of this system. The anatomical and functional organization of the frontostriatal system needs to be considered in decisions pertaining to the neurofeedback targets.
失调的额纹状体回路被视为治疗各种精神和神经疾病中异常行为的共同靶点。因此,实验性神经反馈范式已被应用于改变额纹状体回路。人类额纹状体回路在地形和功能上被组织成“边缘”、“联合”和“运动”子系统,这些子系统是各种情感、认知和运动功能的基础。我们对有关基于功能磁共振成像的神经反馈研究的文献进行了系统综述,这些研究针对额纹状体回路内的脑激活。我们的调查纳入了79项已发表的研究。我们根据神经反馈干预的成像结果以及行为和临床结果评估了这些研究的疗效。此外,我们评估了这些研究的神经反馈靶点是否可以归为可识别的额纹状体子系统。大多数针对额纹状体回路功能的研究集中在前扣带回皮层、背外侧前额叶皮层和辅助运动区。只有少数研究(n = 14)针对额纹状体区域的连接性。然而,更多病例(n = 32)报告了对连接性变化的分析。神经反馈经常被用于改变额纹状体回路内的脑激活。鉴于额纹状体回路闭环内的调节机制,基于连接性的神经反馈范式应主要用于该系统的改变。在有关神经反馈靶点的决策中,需要考虑额纹状体系统的解剖和功能组织。