Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China.
Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Aug 29;12:935071. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.935071. eCollection 2022.
Cervical cancer screening is very important in the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer. In China, the cervical screening strategy needs to be improved. To explore a suitable cervical screening strategy in China, we evaluated the performance of the human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA (Aptima HPV (AHPV)) assay in primary screening and different triage strategies for women undergoing routine cervical screening.
A total of 10,002 women aged 35 to 65 years of age were recruited in Liaoning Province and Qingdao City, China. Specimens were tested by liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the AHPV assay, and women who tested positive on any test were referred for colposcopy. Genotyping was performed on all high-risk HPV (HR-HPV)-positive samples. Test characteristics were calculated based on histological review.
We identified 109 women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+), including six with cervical cancer. The sensitivity of AHPV was clearly higher than that of LBC (92.7 [95% CI: 87.2, 97.2] . 67.9 [95% CI: 59.6, 76.1], < 0.001). The specificity of AHPV was 93.0 (95% CI: 92.5, 93.5), which was lower than that of LBC (95.2 [95% CI: 94.8, 95.6], < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the positive predictive value of AHPV and LBC (13.5 [95% CI: 11.2, 16.2] . 14.3 [95% CI: 11.4, 17.6], = 0.695). The difference of area under the curve (AUC) values between the AHPV test (0.928 [95% CI: 0.904, 0.953]) and LBC test (0.815 [95% CI: 0.771, 0.860]) in detecting HSIL+ was statistically significant ( < 0.001). Finally, among the three triage strategies, both the sensitivity (73.4 [95% CI: 65.1, 81.7]) and AUC (0.851 [95% CI: 0.809, 0.892]) of AHPV genotyping with reflex LBC triage were the greatest.
In summary, the AHPV assay is both specific and sensitive for detecting HSIL+ and may be suitable for use in primary cervical cancer screening in China. AHPV genotyping with reflex LBC triage may be a feasible triage strategy.
宫颈癌筛查对于宫颈癌的预防和治疗非常重要。在中国,需要改进宫颈癌筛查策略。为了探索适合中国的宫颈癌筛查策略,我们评估了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)E6/E7mRNA(Aptima HPV(AHPV))检测在初筛和不同分流策略中的表现,用于接受常规宫颈癌筛查的女性。
在中国辽宁省和青岛市招募了 10002 名 35 至 65 岁的女性。标本通过液基细胞学(LBC)和 AHPV 检测进行检测,任何检测呈阳性的女性均转诊行阴道镜检查。对所有高危型 HPV(HR-HPV)阳性样本进行基因分型。基于组织学评估计算检测特征。
我们共发现 109 名高级别鳞状上皮内病变或更严重病变(HSIL+)的女性,包括 6 名宫颈癌患者。AHPV 的敏感性明显高于 LBC(92.7%[95%CI:87.2%,97.2%]. 67.9%[95%CI:59.6%,76.1%],<0.001)。AHPV 的特异性为 93.0%(95%CI:92.5%,93.5%),低于 LBC(95.2%[95%CI:94.8%,95.6%],<0.001)。AHPV 和 LBC 的阳性预测值无统计学差异(13.5%[95%CI:11.2%,16.2%]. 14.3%[95%CI:11.4%,17.6%],=0.695)。AHPV 检测(0.928[95%CI:0.904%,0.953%])与 LBC 检测(0.815[95%CI:0.771%,0.860%])在检测 HSIL+方面的曲线下面积(AUC)值差异有统计学意义(<0.001)。最后,在三种分流策略中,AHPV 基因分型联合阴道镜下 LBC 分流的敏感性(73.4%[95%CI:65.1%,81.7%])和 AUC(0.851[95%CI:0.809%,0.892%])均最大。
总之,AHPV 检测在检测 HSIL+方面具有特异性和敏感性,可能适合在中国用于宫颈癌的初级筛查。AHPV 基因分型联合阴道镜下 LBC 分流可能是一种可行的分流策略。