Suppr超能文献

人乳头瘤病毒 E6/E7mRNA 检测在原发性宫颈癌筛查和分流中的表现:中国基于人群的筛查。

Performance of human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA assay for primary cervical cancer screening and triage: Population-based screening in China.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China.

Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Aug 29;12:935071. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.935071. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cervical cancer screening is very important in the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer. In China, the cervical screening strategy needs to be improved. To explore a suitable cervical screening strategy in China, we evaluated the performance of the human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA (Aptima HPV (AHPV)) assay in primary screening and different triage strategies for women undergoing routine cervical screening.

METHODS

A total of 10,002 women aged 35 to 65 years of age were recruited in Liaoning Province and Qingdao City, China. Specimens were tested by liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the AHPV assay, and women who tested positive on any test were referred for colposcopy. Genotyping was performed on all high-risk HPV (HR-HPV)-positive samples. Test characteristics were calculated based on histological review.

RESULTS

We identified 109 women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+), including six with cervical cancer. The sensitivity of AHPV was clearly higher than that of LBC (92.7 [95% CI: 87.2, 97.2] . 67.9 [95% CI: 59.6, 76.1], < 0.001). The specificity of AHPV was 93.0 (95% CI: 92.5, 93.5), which was lower than that of LBC (95.2 [95% CI: 94.8, 95.6], < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the positive predictive value of AHPV and LBC (13.5 [95% CI: 11.2, 16.2] . 14.3 [95% CI: 11.4, 17.6], = 0.695). The difference of area under the curve (AUC) values between the AHPV test (0.928 [95% CI: 0.904, 0.953]) and LBC test (0.815 [95% CI: 0.771, 0.860]) in detecting HSIL+ was statistically significant ( < 0.001). Finally, among the three triage strategies, both the sensitivity (73.4 [95% CI: 65.1, 81.7]) and AUC (0.851 [95% CI: 0.809, 0.892]) of AHPV genotyping with reflex LBC triage were the greatest.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the AHPV assay is both specific and sensitive for detecting HSIL+ and may be suitable for use in primary cervical cancer screening in China. AHPV genotyping with reflex LBC triage may be a feasible triage strategy.

摘要

目的

宫颈癌筛查对于宫颈癌的预防和治疗非常重要。在中国,需要改进宫颈癌筛查策略。为了探索适合中国的宫颈癌筛查策略,我们评估了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)E6/E7mRNA(Aptima HPV(AHPV))检测在初筛和不同分流策略中的表现,用于接受常规宫颈癌筛查的女性。

方法

在中国辽宁省和青岛市招募了 10002 名 35 至 65 岁的女性。标本通过液基细胞学(LBC)和 AHPV 检测进行检测,任何检测呈阳性的女性均转诊行阴道镜检查。对所有高危型 HPV(HR-HPV)阳性样本进行基因分型。基于组织学评估计算检测特征。

结果

我们共发现 109 名高级别鳞状上皮内病变或更严重病变(HSIL+)的女性,包括 6 名宫颈癌患者。AHPV 的敏感性明显高于 LBC(92.7%[95%CI:87.2%,97.2%]. 67.9%[95%CI:59.6%,76.1%],<0.001)。AHPV 的特异性为 93.0%(95%CI:92.5%,93.5%),低于 LBC(95.2%[95%CI:94.8%,95.6%],<0.001)。AHPV 和 LBC 的阳性预测值无统计学差异(13.5%[95%CI:11.2%,16.2%]. 14.3%[95%CI:11.4%,17.6%],=0.695)。AHPV 检测(0.928[95%CI:0.904%,0.953%])与 LBC 检测(0.815[95%CI:0.771%,0.860%])在检测 HSIL+方面的曲线下面积(AUC)值差异有统计学意义(<0.001)。最后,在三种分流策略中,AHPV 基因分型联合阴道镜下 LBC 分流的敏感性(73.4%[95%CI:65.1%,81.7%])和 AUC(0.851[95%CI:0.809%,0.892%])均最大。

结论

总之,AHPV 检测在检测 HSIL+方面具有特异性和敏感性,可能适合在中国用于宫颈癌的初级筛查。AHPV 基因分型联合阴道镜下 LBC 分流可能是一种可行的分流策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a767/9465014/444a9b5dd8c0/fcimb-12-935071-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验