Suppr超能文献

3 个月时行 MIDAS 评分降低能否预测依瑞奈尤单抗治疗结局?一项真实世界、开放标签试验。

Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial.

机构信息

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

J Headache Pain. 2022 Sep 17;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01480-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Italy, monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are subsidized for the preventive treatment of high frequency and chronic migraine (CM) in patients with a MIgraine Disability ASsessment (MIDAS) score ≥ 11. Eligibility to treatment continuation requires a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at three months (T3). In this study, we evaluate whether a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at T3 is a reliable predictor of response to one-year erenumab treatment.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, real-world study, 77 CM patients were treated with erenumab 70-140 mg s.c. every 28 days for one year (T13). We collected the following variables: monthly migraine days (MMDs), monthly headache days (MHDs), days of acute medication intake, MIDAS, HIT-6, anxiety, depression, quality of life and allodynia. Response to erenumab was evaluated as: i) average reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment period; and ii) percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs during the last 4 weeks after the 13 injection (Responders).

RESULTS

Erenumab induced a sustained reduction in MMDs, MHDs and intake of acute medications across the 12-month treatment period, with 64.9% of patients qualifying as Responders. At T3, 55.8% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score (MIDAS) and 55.4% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs (MMD). MIDAS and MMD patients showed a more pronounced reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment as compared to NON-MIDAS (MIDAS: T0: 23.5 ± 4.9 vs. T13: 7.7 ± 6.2; NON- MIDAS: T0: 21.6 ± 5.4 vs. T13: 11.3 ± 8.8, p = 0.045) and NON-MMD (MMD: T0: 23.0 ± 4.5 vs. T13: 6.6 ± 4.8; NON-MMD: T0: 22.3 ± 6.0 vs. T13: 12.7 ± 9.2, p < 0.001) groups. The percentage of Responders did not differ between MIDAS (74.4%) and NON-MIDAS (52.9%) patients (p = 0.058), while the percentage of Responders was higher in the MMD group (83.3%) when compared to NON-MMD (42.9%) (p = 0.001). MMD predicted the long-term outcome according to a multivariate analysis (Exp(B) = 7.128; p = 0.001), while MIDAS did not. Treatment discontinuation based on MIDAS would have early excluded 36.0% of Responders. Discontinuation based on "either MIDAS or MMD" would have excluded a lower percentage (16%) of Responders.

CONCLUSION

MIDAS only partly reflects the 12-month outcome of erenumab treatment in CM, as it excludes more than one third of responders. A criterion based on the alternative consideration of ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score or MMDs in the first three months of treatment represents a more precise and inclusive option.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was retrospectively registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT05442008). CGRP: Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide.

MIDAS

MIgraine Disability Assessment. MMDs: monthly migraine days. MIDAS: Patients with a MIDAS score reduction of at least 50% at T3. MMD: Patients with a MMDs reduction of at least 50% at T3. Responder: Patients with a MMDs reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the last 4 weeks of observation period (after 13 erenumab administrations). T0: First erenumab administration. T3, T6, T9, T12: Follow-up visits at three, six, nine, and twelve months after first erenumab administration. T13: Last visit of the protocol.

摘要

背景

在意大利,针对 CGRP 通路的单克隆抗体被补贴用于预防治疗高频率和慢性偏头痛(CM),患者的偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)得分为≥11。继续治疗的资格要求在三个月(T3)时 MIDAS 评分至少降低 50%。在这项研究中,我们评估了 T3 时 MIDAS 评分降低 50%是否是对依那西普治疗一年反应的可靠预测指标。

方法

在这项前瞻性、开放标签、真实世界研究中,77 例 CM 患者接受依那西普 70-140mg sc,每 28 天一次,共治疗 1 年(T13)。我们收集了以下变量:每月偏头痛天数(MMDs)、每月头痛天数(MHDs)、急性药物摄入天数、MIDAS、HIT-6、焦虑、抑郁、生活质量和感觉异常。对依那西普的反应评估为:i)在 1 年治疗期间 MMDs 的平均减少量;ii)最后 4 周内 MMDs 减少≥50%的患者比例(应答者)。

结果

依那西普在 12 个月的治疗期间持续降低 MMDs、MHDs 和急性药物的摄入,64.9%的患者符合应答者标准。在 T3 时,55.8%的患者报告 MIDAS 评分降低≥50%(MIDAS),55.4%的患者报告 MMDs 降低≥50%(MMD)。与非 MIDAS 组相比,MIDAS 和 MMD 患者在 1 年治疗期间 MMDs 减少更明显(MIDAS:T0:23.5±4.9 vs. T13:7.7±6.2;非 MIDAS:T0:21.6±5.4 vs. T13:11.3±8.8,p=0.045)和非 MMD 组(MMD:T0:23.0±4.5 vs. T13:6.6±4.8;非 MMD:T0:22.3±6.0 vs. T13:12.7±9.2,p<0.001)。在 MIDAS(74.4%)和非 MIDAS(52.9%)患者中,应答者的比例没有差异(p=0.058),而在 MMD 组(83.3%)中,应答者的比例高于非 MMD 组(42.9%)(p=0.001)。多变量分析显示 MMD 预测长期结果(Exp(B)=7.128;p=0.001),而 MIDAS 则没有。基于 MIDAS 的治疗中断将排除 36.0%的应答者。基于“MIDAS 或 MMD 任一项”的治疗中断将排除较低比例(16%)的应答者。

结论

MIDAS 仅部分反映依那西普治疗 CM 的 12 个月结果,因为它排除了三分之一以上的应答者。基于 T3 时 MIDAS 评分或 MMDs 降低≥50%的替代考虑的标准代表了更精确和包容性的选择。

试验注册

该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上进行了回顾性注册(NCT05442008)。CGRP:降钙素基因相关肽。MIDAS:偏头痛残疾评估。MMDs:每月偏头痛天数。MIDAS:T3 时 MIDAS 评分降低至少 50%的患者。MMD:T3 时 MMDs 降低至少 50%的患者。应答者:最后 4 周观察期(依那西普 13 次给药后)MMD 降低至少 50%的患者。T0:第一次依那西普给药。T3、T6、T9、T12:第一次依那西普给药后 3、6、9 和 12 个月的随访。T13:方案的最后一次就诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4855/9482180/6db185a70b5c/10194_2022_1480_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验