Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital of the Hackensack Meridian Health Network, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Division of Nephrology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Kidney360. 2022 Mar 10;3(5):900-909. doi: 10.34067/KID.0004162021. eCollection 2022 May 26.
Despite increasing recognition that CKD may have underlyi ng genetic causes, genetic testing remains limited. This study evaluated the diagnostic yield and phenotypic spectrum of CKD in individuals tested through the KIDNEYCODE sponsored genetic testing program.
Unrelated individuals who received panel testing (17 genes) through the KIDNEYCODE sponsored genetic testing program were included. Individuals had to meet at least one of the following eligibility criteria: eGFR ≤90 ml/min per 1.73m and hematuria or a family history of kidney disease; or suspected/biopsy-confirmed Alport syndrome or FSGS in tested individuals or relatives.
Among 859 individuals, 234 (27%) had molecular diagnoses in genes associated with Alport syndrome (=209), FSGS (=12), polycystic kidney disease (=6), and other disorders (=8). Among those with positive findings in a gene, the majority were in (=157, 72 hemizygous male and 85 heterozygous female individuals). A positive family history of CKD, regardless of whether clinical features were reported, was more predictive of a positive finding than was the presence of clinical features alone. For the 248 individuals who had kidney biopsies, a molecular diagnosis was returned for 49 individuals (20%). Most (=41) individuals had a molecular diagnosis in a gene, 25 of whom had a previous Alport syndrome clinical diagnosis, and the remaining 16 had previous clinical diagnoses including FSGS (=2), thin basement membrane disease (=9), and hematuria (=1). In total, 491 individuals had a previous clinical diagnosis, 148 (30%) of whom received a molecular diagnosis, the majority (89%, =131) of which were concordant.
Although skewed to identify individuals with Alport syndrome, these findings support the need to improve access to genetic testing for patients with CKD-particularly in the context of family history of kidney disease, hematuria, and hearing loss.
尽管人们越来越认识到 CKD 可能有潜在的遗传原因,但遗传检测仍然有限。本研究通过 KIDNEYCODE 赞助的基因检测计划评估了接受基因检测的个体的 CKD 的诊断产量和表型谱。
本研究纳入了通过 KIDNEYCODE 赞助的基因检测计划接受面板检测(17 个基因)的无血缘关系个体。个体必须符合以下至少一项纳入标准:eGFR≤90 ml/min/1.73m 和血尿,或有肾脏病家族史;或检测个体或亲属中存在疑似/活检证实的 Alport 综合征或 FSGS。
在 859 名个体中,有 234 名(27%)在与 Alport 综合征相关的基因中发现了分子诊断(=209)、FSGS(=12)、多囊肾病(=6)和其他疾病(=8)。在基因阳性发现的个体中,大多数为 X 染色体基因突变(=157,72 名半合子男性和 85 名杂合子女性个体)。阳性的 CKD 家族史,无论是否报告了临床特征,比仅存在临床特征更能预测阳性发现。对于 248 名接受肾脏活检的个体,有 49 名(20%)个体返回了分子诊断。大多数(=41)个体在 基因中发现了分子诊断,其中 25 名个体有先前的 Alport 综合征临床诊断,其余 16 名个体有先前的临床诊断,包括 FSGS(=2)、薄基底膜肾病(=9)和血尿(=1)。总的来说,有 491 名个体有先前的临床诊断,其中 148 名(30%)接受了分子诊断,其中大多数(89%,=131)是一致的。
尽管该研究偏向于识别 Alport 综合征个体,但这些发现支持需要改善 CKD 患者获得基因检测的机会——特别是在肾脏病、血尿和听力损失家族史的情况下。