Merchant Nathan D, Putland Rosalyn L, André Michel, Baudin Eric, Felli Mario, Slabbekoorn Hans, Dekeling René
Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ocean Coast Manag. 2022 Sep 1;228:None. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106299.
Underwater noise from human activities is now widely recognised as a threat to marine life. Nevertheless, legislation which directly addresses this source of pollution is lacking. The first (and currently only) example globally is Descriptor 11 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), adopted by the European Union in 2008, which requires that levels of underwater noise pollution do not adversely affect marine ecosystems. The MSFD has stimulated a concerted research effort across Europe to develop noise monitoring programmes and to conduct research towards specifying threshold values which would define 'Good Environmental Status' (GES) for underwater noise. Here, we chart the progress made during the first decade of Descriptor 11's implementation: 2010-2020. Several international joint monitoring programmes have been established for impulsive and continuous noise, enabling ecosystem-scale assessment for the first time. Research into the impact of noise on individual animals has grown exponentially, demonstrating a range of adverse effects at various trophic levels. However, threshold values for GES must be defined for 'populations of marine animals.' Population-level consequences of noise exposure can be modelled, but data to parameterise such models are currently unavailable for most species, suggesting that alternative approaches to defining GES thresholds will be necessary. To date, the application of measures to reduce noise levels (quieting/noise abatement) has been limited. To address this, the EU in 2021 identified an explicit need to reduce underwater noise pollution in its waters. Delivering on this ambition will require further research focused on the development and implementation of quieting measures.
人类活动产生的水下噪声如今已被广泛视为对海洋生物的一种威胁。然而,目前仍缺乏直接针对这一污染源的立法。全球首个(也是目前唯一的)此类范例是欧盟于2008年通过的《海洋战略框架指令》(MSFD)中的描述符11,该指令要求水下噪声污染水平不得对海洋生态系统产生不利影响。MSFD激发了欧洲范围内的协同研究努力,以制定噪声监测计划,并开展研究以确定界定水下噪声“良好环境状况”(GES)的阈值。在此,我们梳理了描述符11在2010 - 2020年实施的第一个十年期间所取得的进展。已经针对脉冲噪声和连续噪声建立了若干国际联合监测计划,首次实现了生态系统层面的评估。关于噪声对个体动物影响的研究呈指数级增长,显示出在不同营养级存在一系列不利影响。然而,必须为“海洋动物种群”定义GES的阈值。噪声暴露对种群层面的影响可以进行建模,但目前大多数物种缺乏用于参数化此类模型的数据,这表明需要采用其他方法来定义GES阈值。迄今为止,降低噪声水平措施(降噪/噪声消减)的应用一直有限。为解决这一问题,欧盟在2021年明确提出需要减少其海域的水下噪声污染。要实现这一目标,需要进一步开展研究,重点关注降噪措施的开发与实施。