Columbia Business School, Columbia University.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;124(4):848-872. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000439. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
The early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic revealed stark regional variation in the spread of the virus. While previous research has highlighted the impact of regional differences in sociodemographic and economic factors, we argue that regional differences in social and compliance behaviors-the very behaviors through which the virus is transmitted-are critical drivers of the spread of COVID-19, particularly in the early stages of the pandemic. Combining self-reported personality data that capture individual differences in these behaviors (3.5 million people) with COVID-19 prevalence and mortality rates as well as behavioral mobility observations (29 million people) in the United States and Germany, we show that regional personality differences can help explain the early transmission of COVID-19; this is true even after controlling for a wide array of important sociodemographic, economic, and pandemic-related factors. We use specification curve analyses to test the effects of regional personality in a robust and unbiased way. The results indicate that in the early stages of COVID-19, Openness to experience acted as a risk factor, while Neuroticism acted as a protective factor. The findings also highlight the complexity of the pandemic by showing that the effects of regional personality can differ (a) across countries (Extraversion), (b) over time (Openness), and (c) from those previously observed at the individual level (Agreeableness and Conscientiousness). Taken together, our findings support the importance of regional personality differences in the early spread of COVID-19, but they also caution against oversimplified answers to phenomena as complex as a global pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
新冠疫情早期阶段,病毒传播存在明显的区域性差异。虽然此前的研究强调了社会人口学和经济因素的区域差异对病毒传播的影响,但我们认为,社会行为和遵守行为(病毒正是通过这些行为传播的)的区域差异是新冠疫情传播的关键驱动因素,尤其是在疫情早期阶段。本研究结合了捕捉这些行为个体差异的自我报告人格数据(350 万人),以及美国和德国的新冠流行率和死亡率以及行为流动性观察数据(2900 万人),结果表明,区域人格差异可以帮助解释新冠疫情的早期传播;即使在控制了广泛的重要社会人口学、经济和与疫情相关的因素后,这一结论依然成立。我们使用规范曲线分析以稳健和无偏的方式检验了区域人格的影响。结果表明,在新冠疫情早期,经验开放性表现为风险因素,而神经质表现为保护因素。研究结果还通过显示区域人格的影响可能因(a)国家而异(外向性),(b)随时间变化(开放性),以及(c)与个体层面观察到的结果不同(宜人性和尽责性),突显了疫情的复杂性。总之,我们的研究结果支持区域人格差异在新冠疫情早期传播中的重要性,但也告诫人们不要对全球大流行等复杂现象给出过于简单的答案。