Suppr超能文献

接受抗纤维化药物治疗的特发性肺纤维化患者进行肺康复的益处。

Benefits of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Receiving Antifibrotic Drug Treatment.

作者信息

Iwanami Yuji, Ebihara Kento, Nakao Keiko, Sato Naofumi, Miyagi Midori, Nakamura Yasuhiko, Sakamoto Susumu, Kishi Kazuma, Homma Sakae, Ebihara Satoru

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 11;11(18):5336. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185336.

Abstract

Background: Although patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often receive treatment with antifibrotic drugs (AFDs) and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) concurrently, there are no reports on the effect of PR on patients with IPF receiving AFDs. Therefore, we investigated the effect of PR on patients with IPF receiving AFDs. Methods: Eighty-seven eligible patients with IPF (61 male; 72.0 ± 8.1 years; GAP severity stage I/II/III: 26/32/12) were recruited for the study. Patients who completed a 3-month outpatient PR program and those who did not participate were classified into four groups according to use of AFDs: PR group (n = 29), PR+AFD group (n = 11), treatment-free observational group (control group; n = 26), and AFD group (n = 21). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or severity among the groups. Patients were evaluated for physical functions such as 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and muscle strength, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at baseline and at 3 months. Results: In the PR group, dyspnea and 6MWD showed significant improvement after the 3-month PR program (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). HRQOL was significantly worse at 3 months (p < 0.05) in the AFD group, but not in the other groups. The change in 6MWD from baseline to the 3-month time point was significantly higher in the PR+AFD group than in the AFD groups (p < 0.01). Conclusions: It was suggested that AFD treatment reduced exercise tolerance and HRQOL at 3 months; however, the concurrent use of PR may prevent or mitigate these effects.

摘要

背景

尽管特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者常同时接受抗纤维化药物(AFD)治疗和肺康复(PR),但尚无关于PR对接受AFD治疗的IPF患者疗效的报道。因此,我们研究了PR对接受AFD治疗的IPF患者的影响。方法:87例符合条件的IPF患者(男性61例;年龄72.0±8.1岁;GAP严重程度分级I/II/III:26/32/12)被纳入研究。完成3个月门诊PR项目的患者和未参与的患者根据AFD使用情况分为四组:PR组(n = 29)、PR+AFD组(n = 11)、未治疗观察组(对照组;n = 26)和AFD组(n = 21)。各组间年龄、性别或严重程度无显著差异。在基线和3个月时评估患者的身体功能,如6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、肌肉力量、呼吸困难及健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。结果:在PR组,3个月的PR项目后呼吸困难和6MWD有显著改善(分别为p < 0.05和p < 0.01)。AFD组在3个月时HRQOL显著变差(p < 0.05),但其他组无此情况。PR+AFD组从基线到3个月时间点6MWD的变化显著高于AFD组(p < 0.01)。结论:提示AFD治疗在3个月时降低了运动耐量和HRQOL;然而,同时进行PR可能预防或减轻这些影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd80/9505603/80f98aa17300/jcm-11-05336-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验