Chan Kenneth Sik-Kwan, Wong Charlene Hoi-Lam, Choi Horace Cheuk-Wai
Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 4;10(9):1466. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091466.
The public health burden of seasonal influenza is significant, and influenza vaccination is the most effective preventive strategy. Nonetheless, the recommendation of influenza immunization in the pediatric population is still underrepresented. Our work aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of pediatric influenza vaccination with the intranasal live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV).
We performed a systematic review of publications from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, covering the period from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2022. We searched for economic evaluations that studied the impacts of LAIV among children or the pediatric population. Studies that considered incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), in terms of cost per gain in life years, quality adjusted life years, or disability-adjusted life years, were covered. The Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) Extended Checklist was adopted to check the quality of the included studies.
Thirteen studies were included for the final review that were of good or excellent quality. The implementation of influenza vaccination with intranasal LAIV in the pediatric population was cost-effective when compared to the immunization strategies for the elderly and the high-risk groups alone or with no vaccination. The efficacy of LAIV for children, vaccination coverage, and the vaccine price were significant factors to the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination for children. Another significant contribution to the cost-effectiveness was the herd immunity arising from pediatric immunization against influenza.
The implementation of influenza vaccination in the pediatric population with LAIV is cost-effective. Policymakers and health authorities may consider the evidence on the development of the pediatric influenza vaccination in their immunization schedules.
季节性流感的公共卫生负担重大,而流感疫苗接种是最有效的预防策略。尽管如此,儿科人群中流感免疫接种的建议仍未得到充分体现。我们的研究旨在评估使用鼻内减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV)进行儿科流感疫苗接种的成本效益。
我们对PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Scopus在2000年1月1日至2022年4月30日期间发表的文献进行了系统综述。我们搜索了研究LAIV对儿童或儿科人群影响的经济评估。涵盖了考虑增量成本效益比(ICER)的研究,增量成本效益比以每获得生命年、质量调整生命年或伤残调整生命年的成本来衡量。采用共识健康经济标准(CHEC)扩展清单来检查纳入研究的质量。
最终纳入综述的有13项质量良好或优秀的研究。与仅针对老年人和高危人群的免疫策略或不进行疫苗接种相比,在儿科人群中实施鼻内LAIV流感疫苗接种具有成本效益。LAIV对儿童的疗效、疫苗接种覆盖率和疫苗价格是儿童流感疫苗接种成本效益的重要因素。儿科流感免疫接种产生的群体免疫对成本效益也有重要贡献。
在儿科人群中实施鼻内LAIV流感疫苗接种具有成本效益。政策制定者和卫生当局在其免疫计划中可考虑有关儿科流感疫苗接种发展的证据。