Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
IQVIA, Bangalore, India.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(8):4555-4562. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04376-5. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
The aim of this study was to analyze the persistence of women on tamoxifen (TAM) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in Germany, and to investigate possible determinants of non-persistence.
The present retrospective cohort study was based on the IQVIA longitudinal prescription database (LRx). The study included women with an initial prescription of TAM or AIs (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) between January 2016 and December 2020 (index date). Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to show the persistence for TAM and AI, using a therapy gap of 90 or 180 days, respectively. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was further used to estimate the relationship between non-persistence and drug prescription (AI versus TAM), age, and the specialty of the physician initiating therapy (gynecologist, oncologist, or general practitioner).
Up to 5 years after the index date, only 35.1% of AI and 32.5% of TAM patients were continuing therapy when therapy discontinuation was defined as at least 90 days without therapy. Using a 180-day therapy gap, 51.9% of AI and 50.4% of TAM patients remained on therapy after 5 years. Cox regression models reveal that initial therapy with TAM (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.07), therapy initiation by oncologists (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.11), or general practitioners (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.21-1.27) and age ≤ 50 (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.10) were significantly associated with an increased risk of therapy discontinuation.
Overall, the present study indicates that persistence rates are low in all age groups for both TAM and AI treatment. We found several factors (e.g., physician specialty, younger age, and type of endocrine therapy) to be associated with an increased risk for non-persistence.
本研究旨在分析德国女性服用他莫昔芬(TAM)和芳香酶抑制剂(AIs)的持续时间,并探讨非持续治疗的可能决定因素。
本回顾性队列研究基于 IQVIA 纵向处方数据库(LRx)。研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月(索引日期)期间首次接受 TAM 或 AI(阿那曲唑、来曲唑和依西美坦)治疗的女性。采用治疗缺口分别为 90 天和 180 天的 Kaplan-Meier 分析来显示 TAM 和 AI 的持续时间。进一步使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型来估计非持续治疗与药物处方(AI 与 TAM)、年龄以及启动治疗的医生专业(妇科医生、肿瘤医生或全科医生)之间的关系。
截至索引日期后 5 年,当定义停药为至少 90 天无治疗时,只有 35.1%的 AI 患者和 32.5%的 TAM 患者继续治疗。使用 180 天的治疗缺口,5 年后仍有 51.9%的 AI 患者和 50.4%的 TAM 患者继续治疗。Cox 回归模型显示,TAM 初始治疗(HR 1.06,95%CI 1.04-1.07)、肿瘤医生(HR 1.09,95%CI 1.07-1.11)或全科医生(HR 1.24,95%CI 1.21-1.27)和年龄≤50 岁(HR 1.08,95%CI 1.06-1.10)与停药风险增加显著相关。
总体而言,本研究表明,TAM 和 AI 治疗在所有年龄组的持续率均较低。我们发现了一些与非持续治疗风险增加相关的因素(例如,医生专业、年龄较小和内分泌治疗类型)。