Zhao Zi-Tong, Cheng Hou-Ming, Wang Sheng, Liu Hai-Yan, Song Zi-Ming, Zhou Jun-Hui, Pang Ji-Wei, Bai Shun-Wen, Yang Shan-Shan, Ding Jie, Ren Nan-Qi
State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150000, China.
Central & Southern China Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd, Wuhan, 430010, China.
Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2022 May 24;12:100188. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2022.100188. eCollection 2022 Oct.
An effective sponge city construction evaluation system plays a crucial role in evaluating sponge city construction schemes. The construction of a sponge city evaluation system still faces challenges related to incomplete index selection and unscientific weight division. Limited studies have focused on the comprehensive assessment of sponge city construction in the early stages. This study constructed a scientific assessment indicator system and a quantitative indicator weight at all levels by literature review and statistical analysis methods from an objective perspective. To demonstrate how to utilize our evaluation methods, three construction schemes randomly generated by MATLAB were evaluated under evaluation states of constant weight and variable weight, respectively. Scheme 3 had the highest score of 0.638 under the constant weight assessment, but it cannot practically be the final construction scheme due to the imbalance between indicators. Compared to the constant weight assessment, a variable weight assessment can effectively balance the states of the evaluation index with changes in the decision variable. Among the three schemes, Scheme 2 is the best choice with a value of 0.0355 under variable weight evaluation due to punishment and incentives in the variable weight method. The concept of "punishing" a disadvantageous indicator and "motivating" an advantageous indicator increases the relative advantages of the indices, ultimately affecting the assessment results of schemes and leading to a more balanced state. This study provides reasonable analysis and decision-making mechanisms to support decision-making and guide the scientific selection of a construction scheme.
一个有效的海绵城市建设评价体系在评估海绵城市建设方案中起着至关重要的作用。海绵城市评价体系的构建仍面临指标选取不完整和权重划分不科学等挑战。早期针对海绵城市建设综合评估的研究有限。本研究通过文献综述和统计分析方法,从客观角度构建了科学的评估指标体系和各级定量指标权重。为演示如何运用我们的评价方法,分别在固定权重和可变权重的评价状态下,对由MATLAB随机生成的三个建设方案进行了评估。在固定权重评估下,方案3得分最高,为0.638,但由于指标间不平衡,实际上它不可能是最终的建设方案。与固定权重评估相比,可变权重评估能够随着决策变量的变化有效平衡评价指标的状态。在这三个方案中,由于可变权重方法中的惩罚和激励机制,方案2在可变权重评价下的值为0.0355,是最佳选择。对不利指标“惩罚”和对有利指标“激励”的概念增加了指标的相对优势,最终影响方案的评估结果并导致更平衡的状态。本研究提供了合理的分析和决策机制,以支持决策并指导建设方案的科学选择。