Wolf Monika, Seiler Berenike, Vogelsang Valentina, Sydney Hopf Luke, Moll-Koshrawi Parisa, Vettorazzi Eik, Ebenebe Chinedu Ulrich, Singer Dominique, Deindl Philipp
Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 8;10:956920. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.956920. eCollection 2022.
We developed a fiberoptic-assisted tracheoscopy (FAST) method to avoid direct laryngoscopy during surfactant replacement therapy and compared two training approaches on a very low birth weight (VLBW) infant simulator.
This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted at the Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
We recruited physicians, trainees, students, and nurses without prior experience in endoscopic techniques.
Participants were assigned randomly to a group that received instructions according to Peyton's Four-Step Approach and a control group that received standard bedside teaching only.
Primary endpoints were the total and the component times required to place the bronchoscope and the method success.
We recruited 186 participants. Compared with the control group, the Peyton group had a lower mean (±standard deviation) FAST completion time (33.2 ± 27.5 s vs. 79.5 ± 47.9 s, < 0.001; = 1.12) and a higher FAST success rate (95% vs. 84%, = 0.036, = 0.18).
After standardized training, the vast majority of novices completed FAST successfully. Peyton's four-step approach resulted in faster and more successful performance than standardized training.
我们开发了一种纤维支气管镜辅助气管镜检查(FAST)方法,以避免在表面活性剂替代治疗期间进行直接喉镜检查,并在极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿模拟器上比较了两种培训方法。
这项前瞻性随机对照研究在德国汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心新生儿科和儿科重症医学部进行。
我们招募了没有内镜技术经验的医生、实习生、学生和护士。
参与者被随机分配到一组,该组根据佩顿四步法接受指导,另一组为对照组,仅接受标准床边教学。
主要终点是放置支气管镜所需的总时间和各部分时间以及方法成功率。
我们招募了186名参与者。与对照组相比,佩顿组的FAST平均完成时间(±标准差)更低(33.2±27.5秒对79.5±47.9秒,<0.001;效应量=1.12),FAST成功率更高(95%对84%,P=0.036,效应量=0.18)。
经过标准化培训后,绝大多数新手成功完成了FAST。与标准化培训相比,佩顿四步法的操作更快且更成功。