Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):186-197. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01763. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
Combination programmed cell death protein 1/cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4-blockade and dual BRAF/MEK inhibition have each shown significant clinical benefit in patients with -mutant metastatic melanoma, leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exist to guide the choice of either initial therapy or treatment sequence in this population. This study was conducted to determine which initial treatment or treatment sequence produced the best efficacy.
In a phase III trial, patients with treatment-naive -mutant metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either combination nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm A) or dabrafenib/trametinib (arm B) in step 1, and at disease progression were enrolled in step 2 to receive the alternate therapy, dabrafenib/trametinib (arm C) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm D). The primary end point was 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were 3-year OS, objective response rate, response duration, progression-free survival, crossover feasibility, and safety.
A total of 265 patients were enrolled, with 73 going onto step 2 (27 in arm C and 46 in arm D). The study was stopped early by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of a clinically significant end point being achieved. The 2-year OS for those starting on arm A was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.5 to 79.1) and arm B 51.5% (95% CI, 41.7 to 60.4; log-rank = .010). Step 1 progression-free survival favored arm A ( = .054). Objective response rates were arm A: 46.0%; arm B: 43.0%; arm C: 47.8%; and arm D: 29.6%. Median duration of response was not reached for arm A and 12.7 months for arm B ( < .001). Crossover occurred in 52% of patients with documented disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred with similar frequency between arms, and regimen toxicity profiles were as anticipated.
Combination nivolumab/ipilimumab followed by BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy, if necessary, should be the preferred treatment sequence for a large majority of patients.
程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1/细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞-4 阻断联合双 BRAF/MEK 抑制在 -突变型转移性黑色素瘤患者中均显示出显著的临床获益,从而获得了广泛的监管批准。在这一人群中,很少有前瞻性数据可以指导初始治疗或治疗顺序的选择。本研究旨在确定哪种初始治疗或治疗顺序能产生最佳疗效。
在一项 III 期临床试验中,未经治疗的 -突变型转移性黑色素瘤患者被随机分配接受联合纳武单抗/伊匹单抗(A 组)或达拉非尼/曲美替尼(B 组)治疗作为一线治疗,在疾病进展时进入二线治疗,接受另一种治疗药物,达拉非尼/曲美替尼(C 组)或纳武单抗/伊匹单抗(D 组)。主要终点为 2 年总生存率(OS)。次要终点包括 3 年 OS、客观缓解率、缓解持续时间、无进展生存期、交叉可行性和安全性。
共有 265 例患者入组,其中 73 例进入二线治疗(C 组 27 例,D 组 46 例)。由于一个具有临床意义的终点达到,独立数据安全监测委员会提前停止了这项研究。起始治疗为 A 组的患者 2 年 OS 率为 71.8%(95%CI,62.5%至 79.1%),B 组为 51.5%(95%CI,41.7%至 60.4%;对数秩检验=.010)。A 组的一线无进展生存率更优(=.054)。客观缓解率为 A 组:46.0%;B 组:43.0%;C 组:47.8%;D 组:29.6%。A 组的中位缓解持续时间未达到,而 B 组为 12.7 个月(<.001)。有记录疾病进展的患者中,52%发生了交叉。≥3 级毒性在各治疗组中的发生频率相似,且方案毒性特征与预期相符。
对于大多数患者,纳武单抗/伊匹单抗联合治疗后序贯 BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂治疗应作为首选治疗方案。