Zumbrunnen Valerie, Riegler Thomas F, Haile Sarah R, Radtke Thomas
Berner Reha Zentrum AG, Heiligenschwendi, Switzerland.
Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Science, Bern, Switzerland.
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Sep 26;8(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00033-2022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Is there a difference in the number of repetitions in the 1-minute sit-to-stand (1MSTS) test using an individually adapted seat height to 90° knee flexion (1MSTS), compared with the commonly used standard chair seat height of 46 cm (1MSTS), in people with COPD?
We conducted a single-centre, single-blinded, randomised crossover trial in people with COPD between August 2020 and March 2021 at a specialised rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland. After a learning 1MSTS test, all participants performed two 1MSTS tests in random order on consecutive days. Participants were blinded, as they did not receive detailed information on the testing protocols.
49 individuals with COPD (47% female) participated. In a regression model adjusted for sequence period and subject, 1MSTS test performance was lower on 1MSTS compared to 1MSTS (-0.78 repetitions, 95% CI -1.47 to -0.11). In a second regression model additionally including the knee angle and an interaction term (1MSTS×knee angle), the interaction term was significant: 0.18 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.30). The limits of agreement were between -5.5 and 4 repetitions.
Although we observed a statistically significant difference between 1MSTS and 1MSTS on a population level, the difference is negligible. Further studies may be needed to determine whether individual adaptation of seat height is needed for very tall or short people to ensure a valid assessment of 1MSTS test performance in COPD.
在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,与常用的46厘米标准椅座高的1分钟坐立试验(1MSTS)相比,使用根据个体调整至膝关节屈曲90°的座椅高度进行1分钟坐立试验(1MSTS)时,重复次数是否存在差异?
2020年8月至2021年3月期间,我们在瑞士一家专门的康复诊所对COPD患者进行了一项单中心、单盲、随机交叉试验。在进行一次学习性1MSTS测试后,所有参与者连续两天按随机顺序进行两次1MSTS测试。参与者处于盲态,因为他们未收到关于测试方案的详细信息。
49名COPD患者(47%为女性)参与了研究。在针对序列期和受试者进行调整的回归模型中,与1MSTS相比,1MSTS的测试表现较低(少0.78次重复,95%置信区间为-1.47至-0.11)。在第二个回归模型中,额外纳入了膝关节角度和一个交互项(1MSTS×膝关节角度),该交互项具有显著性:0.18(95%置信区间为0.05至0.30)。一致性界限在-5.5至4次重复之间。
尽管我们在总体水平上观察到1MSTS和1MSTS之间存在统计学上的显著差异,但该差异可忽略不计。可能需要进一步研究来确定对于非常高或非常矮的人是否需要对座椅高度进行个体调整,以确保在COPD患者中对1MSTS测试表现进行有效的评估。