Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Nov 1;133(5):1212-1219. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00426.2022. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
The amount of energy delivered to the respiratory system is recognized as a cause of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). How energy dissipation within the lung parenchyma causes damage is still a matter of debate. Expiratory flow control has been proposed as a strategy to reduce the energy dissipated into the respiratory system during expiration and, possibly, VILI. We studied 22 healthy pigs (29 ± 2 kg), which were randomized into a control ( = 11) and a valve group ( = 11), where the expiratory flow was controlled through a variable resistor. Both groups were ventilated with the same tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and inspiratory flow. Electric impedance tomography was continuously acquired. At completion, lung weight, wet-to-dry ratios, and histology were evaluated. The total mechanical power was similar in the control and valve groups (8.54 ± 0.83 J·min and 8.42 ± 0.54 J·min, respectively, = 0.552). The total energy dissipated within the whole system (circuit + respiratory system) was remarkably different (4.34 ± 0.66 vs. 2.62 ± 0.31 J/min, < 0.001). However, most of this energy was dissipated across the endotracheal tube (2.87 ± 0.3 vs. 1.88 ± 0.2 J/min, < 0.001). The amount dissipated into the respiratory system averaged 1.45 ± 0.5 in controls versus 0.73 ± 0.16 J·min in the valve group, < 0.001. Although respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, hemodynamics, wet-to-dry ratios, and histology were similar in the two groups, the decrease of end-expiratory lung impedance was significantly greater in the control group ( = 0.02). We conclude that with our experimental conditions, the reduction of energy dissipated in the respiratory system did not lead to appreciable differences in VILI. Energy dissipation within the respiratory system is a factor promoting ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In this animal study, we modulated the expiratory flow, reducing the energy dissipated in the system. However, this reduction happened mostly across the endotracheal tube, and only partly in the respiratory system. Therefore, in healthy lungs, the advantage in energy dissipation does not reduce VILI, but the advantages might be more relevant in diseased lungs under injurious ventilation.
输送到呼吸系统的能量被认为是呼吸机引起的肺损伤(VILI)的一个原因。肺实质内的能量消散如何导致损伤仍然存在争议。呼气流量控制已被提议作为一种策略,以减少呼气期间消散到呼吸系统中的能量,并可能减少 VILI。我们研究了 22 头健康猪(29±2kg),将其随机分为对照组(n=11)和瓣膜组(n=11),其中呼气流量通过可变电阻器控制。两组均采用相同的潮气量、呼气末正压(PEEP)和吸气流量进行通气。连续采集电阻抗断层成像。完成后,评估肺重量、湿重/干重比和组织学。对照组和瓣膜组的总机械功率相似(分别为 8.54±0.83J·min 和 8.42±0.54J·min,=0.552)。整个系统(回路+呼吸系统)内消散的总能量差异显著(4.34±0.66 与 2.62±0.31J/min,<0.001)。然而,大部分能量消散在气管内导管中(2.87±0.3 与 1.88±0.2J/min,<0.001)。对照组中消散到呼吸系统的能量平均为 1.45±0.5J/min,而瓣膜组为 0.73±0.16J/min,<0.001。尽管两组的呼吸力学、气体交换、血液动力学、湿重/干重比和组织学相似,但对照组的呼气末肺阻抗下降明显更大(=0.02)。我们的结论是,在我们的实验条件下,减少呼吸系统中消散的能量并没有导致 VILI 明显差异。呼吸系统内的能量消散是促进呼吸机引起的肺损伤(VILI)的一个因素。在这项动物研究中,我们调节呼气流量,减少系统中消散的能量。然而,这种减少主要发生在气管内导管上,而只有一部分发生在呼吸系统中。因此,在健康的肺中,能量消散的优势并不能减少 VILI,但在受损通气下的患病肺中,这种优势可能更为相关。