Bertoletti Otávio A, Ferrari Rodrigo, Ferlin Elton L, Barcellos Ozi M, Fuchs Sandra C
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cardiologia, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Front Physiol. 2022 Sep 13;13:962125. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.962125. eCollection 2022.
The effect of a single isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) on blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has not been addressed. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of IHG vs. sham on BPV and BP. Hypertensive patients using up to two BP-lowering medications were randomly assigned to IHG (4 × 2 min; 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, MVC, with 1 min rest between sets, unilateral) or sham (protocol; 0.3% of MVC). Systolic and diastolic BP were assessed beat-to-beat in the laboratory before, during, and post-intervention and also using 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). BPV was expressed as average real variability (ARV) and standard deviation (SD). Laboratory BPV, ARV and SD variability, had marked increase during the intervention, but not in the sham group, decreasing in the post-intervention recovery period. The overall change in ARV from pre- to 15 min post-intervention were 0.27 ± 0.07 (IHG) vs. 0.05 ± 0.15 (sham group), with a statistically significant -value for interaction. Similarly, mean systolic BP increased during the intervention (IHG 165.4 ± 4.5 vs. sham 152.4 ± 3.5 mmHg; = 0.02) as did diastolic BP (104.0 ± 2.5 vs. 90.5 ± 1.7 mmHg, respectively; < 0.001) and decreased afterward. However, neither the short-term BPV nor BP assessed by ABPM reached statistically significant differences between groups. A single session of IHG reduces very short-term variability but does not affect short-term variability. IHG promotes PEH in the laboratory, but does not sustain 24-h systolic and diastolic PEH beyond the recovery period.
单次等长握力运动(IHG)对血压(BP)变异性(BPV)的影响尚未得到研究。这项随机对照试验评估了IHG与假运动对BPV和BP的影响。使用最多两种降压药物的高血压患者被随机分配到IHG组(4×2分钟;最大自主收缩量的30%,即MVC,每组之间休息1分钟,单侧)或假运动组(方案;MVC的0.3%)。在实验室干预前、干预期间和干预后逐搏评估收缩压和舒张压,同时使用24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)。BPV以平均实际变异性(ARV)和标准差(SD)表示。实验室BPV、ARV和SD变异性在干预期间显著增加,但假运动组未出现这种情况,在干预后的恢复期有所下降。干预前至干预后15分钟ARV的总体变化为0.27±0.07(IHG组)对0.05±0.15(假运动组),交互作用的P值具有统计学意义。同样,干预期间平均收缩压升高(IHG组165.4±4.5对假运动组152.4±3.5 mmHg;P = 0.02),舒张压也升高(分别为104.0±2.5对90.5±1.7 mmHg;P < 0.001),之后下降。然而,ABPM评估的短期BPV和BP在两组之间均未达到统计学显著差异。单次IHG可降低极短期变异性,但不影响短期变异性。IHG在实验室中促进了血压过度升高(PEH),但在恢复期之后并不能维持24小时的收缩压和舒张压PEH。