Suppr超能文献

关节内利多卡因与静脉镇静用于急诊科急性前肩脱位的闭合复位:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Intra-articular lidocaine versus intravenous sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2022 Dec;24(8):809-819. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00368-z. Epub 2022 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). Analgesia for reduction is provided by intra-articular lidocaine (IAL) injection or intravenous sedation (IV sedation). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare IAL versus IV sedation for closed reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the ED.

METHODS

Electronic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (1946-September 2021) were completed and reference lists were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IAL and IV sedation for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations among patients ≥ 15 years old in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included a successful reduction, adverse events, ED length of stay, pain scores, procedure time, ease of reduction, patient satisfaction, and cost. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were pooled using random-effects models and reported as mean differences and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

12 RCTs were included with a total of 630 patients (IAL = 327; IV sedation = 303). There was no difference in reduction success between IAL and IV sedation (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-1.01, I = 69%), significantly lower adverse events with IAL (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.07-0.33, I = 0%), shorter ED length of stay with IAL (mean difference - 1.48; 95% CI - 2.48 to - 0.47, I = 93%), no difference in pain scores post-analgesia and no difference in ease of reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular lidocaine may have similar effectiveness as IV sedation in the successful reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations in the ED with fewer adverse events, shorter ED length of stay, and no difference in pain scores or ease of reduction. Intra-articular lidocaine may be an effective alternative to IV sedation for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations, particularly when IV sedation is contraindicated or not feasible.

摘要

目的

肩关节前脱位在急诊科(ED)中较为常见。关节内利多卡因(IAL)注射或静脉镇静(IV 镇静)用于复位的镇痛。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较 IAL 与 IV 镇静在 ED 中闭合复位急性肩关节前脱位的效果。

方法

对 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE(1946 年-2021 年 9 月)进行电子检索,并手动检索参考文献列表。纳入比较 IAL 与 IV 镇静在 ED 中用于治疗≥15 岁患者急性肩关节前脱位复位的随机对照试验(RCT)。感兴趣的结局包括复位成功、不良事件、ED 停留时间、疼痛评分、操作时间、复位难易程度、患者满意度和成本。两位审查员独立筛选摘要、评估研究质量并提取数据。使用随机效应模型汇总数据,并报告均数差和风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共纳入 12 项 RCT,共 630 例患者(IAL=327;IV 镇静=303)。IAL 和 IV 镇静在复位成功率方面无差异(RR 0.93;95%CI 0.86-1.01,I²=69%),IAL 显著降低不良事件风险(RR 0.16;95%CI 0.07-0.33,I²=0%),IAL 缩短 ED 停留时间(平均差-1.48;95%CI -2.48 至 -0.47,I²=93%),镇痛后疼痛评分无差异,复位难易程度无差异。

结论

IAL 可能与 IV 镇静在 ED 中成功复位肩关节前脱位的效果相当,不良事件更少,ED 停留时间更短,镇痛后疼痛评分和复位难易程度无差异。IAL 可能是 IV 镇静治疗肩关节前脱位的有效替代方法,特别是在 IV 镇静禁忌或不可行的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a79f/9525937/317337fb262d/43678_2022_368_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验