Suppr超能文献

社区居住的老年人开始使用苏沃雷生与Z类药物相比的骨折风险比较:LIFE研究结果。

Comparative risk of fracture in community-dwelling older adults initiating suvorexant versus Z-drugs: Results from LIFE study.

作者信息

Adomi Motohiko, Maeda Megumi, Murata Fumiko, Fukuda Haruhisa

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Health Care Administration and Management, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):109-120. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18068. Epub 2022 Oct 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increased risk of fracture has been reported in older adults taking hypnotics. However, few studies have reported the comparative safety of hypnotics with different mechanisms of action. We examined the risk of fracture in older adults initiating suvorexant compared to those initiating Z-drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a claims database within a longevity improvement and fair evidence (LIFE) study in Japan (1.5 million beneficiaries). People aged ≥65 years were included in this study. Exposure was defined as the initiation of either suvorexant or Z-drugs (eszopiclone, zolpidem, or zopiclone). The evaluated outcomes were hip fracture and all-cause fracture requiring hospitalization. We used inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding and followed the incidence of the outcome for three different periods: 30, 90, and 365 days. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the weighted population to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Sensitivity analyses were performed with narrowed outcome definitions and inverse probability of censoring weights.

RESULTS

We identified 16,148 suvorexant new users and 54,327 Z-drugs new users. During the 30-day follow-up, 21 (16.6 events per 1000 person-years) and 53 hip fractures (12.2 events per 1000 person-years) were identified among suvorexant and Z-drugs new users, respectively (HR: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.76). The analysis for all-cause fracture showed an HR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78-1.36). Extended follow-up (90 and 365 days) showed similar results for both outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results except for an increased risk of all-cause fracture requiring surgery (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.87-2.29) during the 30-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that suvorexant has a generally comparable risk of fracture as compared to Z-drugs. Further research is needed to investigate the potential short-term increased risk of all-cause fracture requiring surgery among suvorexant initiators.

摘要

背景

据报道,服用催眠药的老年人骨折风险增加。然而,很少有研究报告不同作用机制催眠药的比较安全性。我们比较了使用苏沃雷生的老年人与使用Z类药物的老年人的骨折风险。

方法

我们在日本一项长寿改善与公平证据(LIFE)研究(150万受益者)中使用索赔数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。本研究纳入了年龄≥65岁的人群。暴露定义为开始使用苏沃雷生或Z类药物(艾司佐匹克隆、唑吡坦或佐匹克隆)。评估的结局为髋部骨折和需要住院治疗的全因骨折。我们使用治疗权重的逆概率来调整混杂因素,并随访三个不同时间段(30天、90天和365天)的结局发生率。对加权人群拟合Cox比例风险模型以估计风险比(HRs)。采用狭义结局定义和截尾权重的逆概率进行敏感性分析。

结果

我们确定了16148名苏沃雷生新使用者和54327名Z类药物新使用者。在30天的随访期间,苏沃雷生新使用者和Z类药物新使用者中分别有21例(每1000人年16.6例)和53例髋部骨折(每1000人年12.2例)(HR:1.01,95%置信区间[CI]:0.58 - 1.76)。全因骨折分析显示HR为1.03(95%CI:0.78 - 1.36)。延长随访(90天和365天)对两个结局均显示出相似结果。敏感性分析显示结果一致,但在30天随访期间,需要手术的全因骨折风险增加(HR:1.41,95%CI:0.87 - 2.29)。

结论

这是第一项表明苏沃雷生与Z类药物相比骨折风险总体相当的研究。需要进一步研究来调查开始使用苏沃雷生的人群中短期内需要手术的全因骨折潜在增加的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验