Suppr超能文献

脚本一致性测试在儿科学中对形成性临床推理和问题解决评估的应用。

Script Concordance Tests for Formative Clinical Reasoning and Problem-Solving Assessment in General Pediatrics.

机构信息

Third-Year Medical Student, University of Florida College of Medicine.

Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Sep 20;18:11274. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11274. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Script Concordance Tests (SCTs) are short clinical vignettes with proposed diagnoses, diagnostic studies, treatments, and management options for patient care scenarios. The SCTs included in this resource were incorporated into a required pediatric clerkship to facilitate formative student feedback and additional opportunities for precepting faculty to provide midclerkship feedback. Pediatric cases were specifically selected due to the scarcity of medical student experience with common pediatric clinical presentations.

METHODS

We developed eight themed SCTs comprising 72 individual test items focused on common topics in general pediatrics. Items were administered to a convenience sample of third-year medical students during their required pediatric clerkship between fall 2016 and spring 2020. To evaluate the SCTs, we conducted item analyses, as well as comparing student performance to summative assessments.

RESULTS

The mean aggregate percentage score across all SCTs was .84 ( = .08). Student SCT performance was related to USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores, clerkship grades, and NBME Pediatrics Shelf Exam scores.

DISCUSSION

These SCTs facilitated feedback to medical students in the clinical learning environment. Their current form provides a means of exploring student clinical reasoning and problem-solving and can be used at a single point or to measure longitudinally. When paired with structured subject- and competency-specific midclerkship student evaluation, SCTs helped facilitate timely feedback to students via immediate explanations of each question. SCTs can assist students in recognizing and reflecting on potential knowledge gaps.

摘要

简介

脚本一致性测试(SCT)是简短的临床病例,包含针对患者护理场景的拟议诊断、诊断研究、治疗和管理选项。本资源中包含的 SCT 被纳入必修儿科实习课程,以促进形成性学生反馈和额外的指导教师提供中期实习反馈的机会。选择儿科病例是因为医学生在常见儿科临床表现方面经验有限。

方法

我们开发了 8 个主题 SCT,包含 72 个单独的测试项目,重点关注一般儿科的常见主题。在 2016 年秋季至 2020 年春季期间,我们向三年级医学生的必修儿科实习课程中的方便样本提供了这些 SCT。为了评估 SCT,我们进行了项目分析,并将学生的表现与总结性评估进行了比较。

结果

所有 SCT 的平均综合百分比分数为.84( =.08)。学生 SCT 表现与 USMLE 第 2 步临床知识分数、实习成绩和 NBME 儿科学架考试分数相关。

讨论

这些 SCT 促进了在临床学习环境中为医学生提供反馈。它们目前的形式提供了一种探索学生临床推理和解决问题的方法,可以在单个点或纵向使用。当与结构化的中期实习学生评估相结合时,SCT 通过对每个问题的即时解释,帮助学生及时获得反馈。SCT 可以帮助学生识别和反思潜在的知识差距。

相似文献

1
Script Concordance Tests for Formative Clinical Reasoning and Problem-Solving Assessment in General Pediatrics.
MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Sep 20;18:11274. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11274. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluating clinical reasoning in first year DPT students using a script concordance test.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05281-w.
4
Gathering Validity Evidence on an Internal Medicine Clerkship Multistep Exam to Assess Medical Student Analytic Ability.
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1749635. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
5
Medical student perceptions of assessments of clinical reasoning in a general surgery clerkship.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05184-w.
7
Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):330-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1721293. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
9
Are script concordance tests suitable for the assessment of undergraduate students? A multicenter comparative study.
Rev Med Interne. 2021 Apr;42(4):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pilot Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Sep 25;20:11447. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11447. eCollection 2024.
2
CRISP: An Inpatient Pediatric Curriculum for Family Medicine Residents Using Clinical Reasoning and Illness Scripts.
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Mar 22;20:11393. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11393. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
Identifying Students at Risk of Failing the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination.
Fam Med. 2019 Jun;51(6):483-499. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.429968.
7
Assessment in the context of uncertainty using the script concordance test: more meaning for scores.
Teach Learn Med. 2010 Jul;22(3):180-6. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2010.488197.
8
The validity of performance-based measures of clinical reasoning and alternative approaches.
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):320-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03281.x.
9
Script concordance testing: more cases or more questions?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Aug;14(3):367-75. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9120-8. Epub 2008 May 15.
10
To the point: medical education reviews--providing feedback.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验