INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Health Services Research Unit, FISABIO, Catalunya Av. 21, 46020, Valencia, Spain.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jan;38(1):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07791-z. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
Patient empowerment through pharmacological self-management is a common strategy in some chronic diseases such as diabetes, but it is rarely used for controlling blood pressure.
This study aimed to assess self-monitoring plus self-titration of antihypertensive medication versus usual care for reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 months in poorly controlled hypertensive patients.
The ADAMPA study was a pragmatic, controlled, randomized, non-masked clinical trial with two parallel arms in Valencia, Spain.
Hypertensive patients older than 40 years, with SBP over 145 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) over 90 mmHg, were recruited from July 2017 to June 2018.
Participants were randomized 1:1 to usual care versus an individualized, pre-arranged plan based on self-monitoring plus self-titration.
The primary outcome was the adjusted mean difference (AMD) in SBP between groups at 12 months.
Primary outcome data were available for 312 patients (intervention n=156, control n=156) of the 366 who were initially recruited. The AMD in SBP at 12 months (main analysis) was -2.9 mmHg (95% CI, -5.9 to 0.1, p=0.061), while the AMD in DBP was -1.9 mmHg (95% CI, -3.7 to 0.0, p=0.052). The results of the subgroup analysis were consistent with these for the main outcome measures. More patients in the intervention group achieved good blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg) at 12 months than in the control group (55.8% vs 42.3%, difference 13.5%, 95% CI, 2.5 to 24.5%, p=0.017). At 12 months, no differences were observed in behavior, quality of life, use of health services, or adverse events.
Self-monitoring plus self-titration of antihypertensive medication based on an individualized pre-arranged plan used in primary care may be a promising strategy for reducing blood pressure at 12 months compared to usual care, without increasing healthcare utilization or adverse events.
EudraCT, number 2016-003986-25 (registered 17 March 2017) and clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03242785.
通过药理学自我管理实现患者赋权是糖尿病等一些慢性病的常见策略,但很少用于控制血压。
本研究旨在评估在血压控制不佳的高血压患者中,与常规护理相比,自我监测加自我滴定降压药物在 12 个月时降低收缩压(SBP)的效果。
ADAMPA 研究是一项在西班牙巴伦西亚进行的实用、对照、随机、非盲临床试验,采用两平行组设计。
招募了年龄大于 40 岁、SBP 超过 145mmHg 和/或舒张压(DBP)超过 90mmHg 的高血压患者,招募时间为 2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月。
参与者按 1:1 随机分为常规护理组和基于自我监测加自我滴定的个体化预先安排计划组。
主要结局为 12 个月时两组间 SBP 的调整平均差异(AMD)。
366 名最初招募的患者中,有 312 名(干预组 156 名,对照组 156 名)患者提供了主要结局数据。12 个月时 SBP 的 AMD 为-2.9mmHg(95%CI,-5.9 至 0.1,p=0.061),而 DBP 的 AMD 为-1.9mmHg(95%CI,-3.7 至 0.0,p=0.052)。亚组分析的结果与主要结局测量结果一致。干预组在 12 个月时达到良好血压控制(<140/90mmHg)的患者比例高于对照组(55.8%比 42.3%,差异为 13.5%,95%CI,2.5 至 24.5%,p=0.017)。12 个月时,两组在行为、生活质量、卫生服务利用或不良事件方面无差异。
与常规护理相比,基于个体化预先安排计划的自我监测加自我滴定降压药物在初级保健中可能是一种有前途的策略,可在 12 个月时降低血压,而不会增加医疗保健利用或不良事件。
EudraCT,编号 2016-003986-25(2017 年 3 月 17 日注册)和 clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03242785。