Department of Global Public Health, Center for Research on Health Care in Disasters, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine,Humanitarian Aid, and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Matern Child Nutr. 2023 Jan;19(1):e13440. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13440. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
In 1998, the World Health Organisation (WHO) published general guidelines proposing essential measures to achieve relactation. Yet, increased knowledge about the practical set-up of relactation support interventions in different contexts is needed, especially in humanitarian settings, where nonbreastfed infants are particularly at risk. This study aimed to compile and assess the characteristics, outcomes and factors influencing the implementation of relactation support interventions reported since the latest WHO recommendations. We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, undertaking a search from Medline, Embase, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Global Health and CINAHL electronic databases. Studies published in English and Spanish, reporting characteristics and outcomes of relactation support provided to non-(breastfeeding) BF mothers with infants aged less than 6 months were included. Data were analysed by narrative synthesis and the Johanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used for quality assessment. Overall, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were observational and conducted in middle-income countries, only one focused on humanitarian settings. Studies reported inpatient and community-based interventions, which generally followed WHO recommendations for relactation. In 13 out of 16 studies, over 80% of mothers restarted BF after receiving relactation support. Enabling factors included younger infant age, shorter lactation gap, mother's strong motivation, family support, and continuous skilled support. Although current literature suggests that intensive relactation support can contribute to re-establish BF, its application and effectiveness in humanitarian settings remain uncertain. Further research is needed to explore the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of different approaches to relactation support, especially in humanitarian settings.
1998 年,世界卫生组织(WHO)发布了一般性指导方针,提出了实现重新哺乳的基本措施。然而,需要更多地了解在不同环境下重新哺乳支持干预措施的实际设置,特别是在人道主义环境中,非母乳喂养的婴儿尤其面临风险。本研究旨在汇编和评估自最新世卫组织建议以来报告的重新哺乳支持干预措施的特征、结果和影响实施的因素。我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统审查,从 Medline、Embase、PubMed Central、Web of Science、全球卫生和 CINAHL 电子数据库进行了搜索。纳入了报告为年龄小于 6 个月的非(母乳喂养)BF 母亲提供重新哺乳支持的特征和结果的英文和西班牙语发表的研究。使用叙述性综合和 Johanna Briggs 研究所批判性评估工具对数据进行分析,以评估质量。总的来说,有 16 项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究为观察性研究,在中等收入国家进行,只有一项研究专注于人道主义环境。研究报告了住院和社区为基础的干预措施,这些干预措施通常遵循世卫组织关于重新哺乳的建议。在 16 项研究中有 13 项研究中,超过 80%的母亲在接受重新哺乳支持后重新开始母乳喂养。有利因素包括婴儿年龄较小、哺乳间隔较短、母亲强烈的动机、家庭支持和持续的熟练支持。尽管目前的文献表明,密集的重新哺乳支持可以有助于重新建立母乳喂养,但它在人道主义环境中的应用和有效性仍不确定。需要进一步研究来探索重新哺乳支持的不同方法的有效性、可行性和可接受性,特别是在人道主义环境中。