Vitali Agnese, Fraboni Romina
Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Istat-Italian National Institute of Statistics, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Popul. 2022 Aug 9;38(4):721-754. doi: 10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Previous studies documented the existence of a 'cohabitation-marriage gap' in resource pooling among opposite-sex partners, with cohabiters being more likely to separate income and wealth than married individuals. Surprisingly, despite many non-marital cohabitations transform into marriages, we know little about income and wealth pooling of 'spousal cohabiters', i.e. spouses who transition to marriage after experiencing a period of non-marital cohabitation. The comparison between 'spousal cohabiters' and directly married spouses is particularly interesting because it offers a litmus test of theories of marriage in relation to how and why economic resources are differently distributed within married vs. cohabiting couples. This paper compares directly married couples and 'spousal cohabiters' in Italy, focusing on one aspect of resource pooling: the marital property regime, i.e. the choice made at the time of marriage between joint or separate ownership of wealth accumulated during marriage. Competing hypotheses are developed on the basis of the arguments that marriage yields legal protection, that selection mechanisms drive both the choice of community vs. separation of property and direct marriage vs. premarital cohabitation, and that, by inertia, 'spousal cohabiters' continue to separate resources upon transition to marriage. Results based on the 2016 Italian 'Family and social subjects' survey show that 'spousal cohabiters' are significantly more likely to choose separation of property compared to directly married spouses. Such differences, however, are drastically reduced once relevant confounders are controlled for, hence suggesting that existing differences between directly married and previously cohabiting couples and, more generally, differences between married and cohabiting couples are driven, above all, by selection mechanisms.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2.
以往的研究记录了异性伴侣在资源汇集方面存在“同居 - 婚姻差距”,同居者比已婚者更倾向于分开管理收入和财富。令人惊讶的是,尽管许多非婚姻同居关系会转变为婚姻关系,但我们对“配偶同居者”(即经历一段时间非婚姻同居后步入婚姻的配偶)的收入和财富汇集情况知之甚少。“配偶同居者”与直接结婚的配偶之间的比较尤其有趣,因为它为婚姻理论提供了一个试金石,涉及经济资源在已婚夫妇与同居夫妇中如何以及为何存在不同分配。本文比较了意大利直接结婚的夫妇和“配偶同居者”,重点关注资源汇集的一个方面:婚姻财产制度,即在婚姻时对婚姻期间积累财富的共同或分别所有权的选择。基于婚姻提供法律保护、选择机制驱动财产共有与分开以及直接结婚与婚前同居的选择,并且“配偶同居者”在过渡到婚姻后会因惯性继续分开资源的观点,提出了相互竞争的假设。基于2016年意大利“家庭与社会主题”调查的结果表明,与直接结婚的配偶相比,“配偶同居者”显著更有可能选择财产分开。然而,一旦控制了相关混杂因素,这些差异就会大幅减少,因此表明直接结婚和先前同居的夫妇之间现有的差异,以及更普遍地说,已婚和同居夫妇之间的差异,首先是由选择机制驱动的。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2获取的补充材料。