Kayser Georgia L, Moomaw William, Portillo Jose Miguel Orellana, Griffiths Jeffrey K
The Department of Environmental Science and Engineering and Public Policy, The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health CB#7431, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA.
The Center for International Environment and Resource Policy, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2014 Sep;4(3):460-470. doi: 10.2166/washdev.2014.136. Epub 2014 May 10.
Small piped water supply systems are often unable to provide reliable, microbiologically safe, and sustainable service over time, and this has direct impacts on public health. Circuit Rider (CR) post-construction support (PCS) addresses this through the provision of technical, financial, and operational assistance to these systems. CRPCS operates in low and high-income countries; yet, no rigorous studies of CRPCS exist. We measured the impact of CRPCS on 'water quality' and 'sustainability' indicators (technical and administrative capacity, and water supply protection) in El Salvador. In this field-based study, a case-control design was utilized in 60 randomly selected case (28 CR) and comparable control (32 noCR) communities. Microbiological water quality tests and pre-tested structured key-informant interviews were conducted. The operational costs of CRPCS were also assessed. Data were compared using parametric and non-parametric statistical methods. We found communities with CRPCS had significantly lower microbiological water contamination, better disinfection rates, higher water fee payment rates, greater transparency (measured by auditable banking records), greater rates of household metering, and higher spending for repairs and water treatment than comparable control communities. CRPCS is also a low-cost (<$1 per household/year in El Salvador) drinking water intervention.
小型管道供水系统往往无法长期提供可靠、微生物安全且可持续的服务,这对公众健康有直接影响。巡回骑手(CR)建设后支持(PCS)通过向这些系统提供技术、资金和运营援助来解决这一问题。CRPCS在低收入和高收入国家开展业务;然而,目前尚无对CRPCS的严格研究。我们在萨尔瓦多测量了CRPCS对“水质”和“可持续性”指标(技术和管理能力以及供水保护)的影响。在这项基于实地的研究中,对60个随机选择的案例(28个有CR)和可比对照(32个无CR)社区采用了病例对照设计。进行了微生物水质测试和预先测试的结构化关键信息访谈。还评估了CRPCS的运营成本。使用参数和非参数统计方法对数据进行了比较。我们发现,与可比对照社区相比,有CRPCS的社区微生物水污染显著更低、消毒率更高、水费支付率更高、透明度更高(通过可审计的银行记录衡量)、家庭计量率更高以及维修和水处理支出更高。CRPCS也是一种低成本(在萨尔瓦多每户每年不到1美元)的饮用水干预措施。