Suppr超能文献

对于MRI阴性的新皮质癫痫手术,颅内脑电图是必需的吗?

Is intracranial electroencephalography mandatory for MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy surgery?

作者信息

Guo Zhihao, Zhang Chao, Wang Xiu, Liu Chang, Zhao Baotian, Mo Jiajie, Zheng Zhong, Shao Xiaoqiu, Zhang Jianguo, Zhang Kai, Hu Wenhan

机构信息

1Departments of Neurosurgery and.

4Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Fengtai Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2022 Oct 14;138(6):1720-1730. doi: 10.3171/2022.8.JNS22995. Print 2023 Jun 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

MRI-negative focal epilepsy is one of the most challenging cases in surgical epilepsy treatment. Many epilepsy centers recommend intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) for MRI-negative cases, especially neocortical epilepsy. This retrospective study aimed to explore whether intracranial monitoring is mandatory in MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy surgery and the factors that significantly influence the decision on whether to perform intracranial recording.

METHODS

In this study, consecutive surgical patients with focal MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy were recruited. All patients underwent routine preoperative evaluation according to the dedicated protocol of the authors' epilepsy center to determine the treatment strategy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical strategy, i.e., a direct group and a stereo-EEG (SEEG)-guided group. History of epilepsy, seizure frequency, interictal and ictal EEG data, PET data, PET/MRI coregistration data, neuropathological findings, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors influencing the decision to perform SEEG monitoring.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included in this study, 19 and 45 of whom underwent direct and SEEG-guided cortical resection, respectively. At an average follow-up of 3.9 years postoperatively, 56 patients (87.5%) had Engel class I results without permanent neurological deficits. Surgical outcomes were not significantly different between the direct and SEEG-guided groups (94.7% vs 84.4%). PET hypometabolic abnormalities were detected in all patients. There were significant differences between the two groups in the extent of hypometabolism (focal vs nonfocal, p < 0.01) and pathological subtype (focal cortical dysplasia type II vs others, p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that the extent of hypometabolism (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.15; p = 0.001) was the only independent factor affecting the treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful selection of patients with MRI-negative neocortical epilepsy may yield favorable outcomes after direct cortical resection without intracranial monitoring. PET/MRI coregistration plays an essential role in the preoperative evaluation and subsequent resection of these patients. Intracranial monitoring is not a mandatory requirement for surgery if the focal hypometabolic areas are consistent with the findings of semiology and scalp EEG.

摘要

目的

磁共振成像(MRI)阴性的局灶性癫痫是外科癫痫治疗中最具挑战性的病例之一。许多癫痫中心建议对MRI阴性的病例,尤其是新皮质癫痫,进行颅内脑电图(EEG)检查。这项回顾性研究旨在探讨在MRI阴性的新皮质癫痫手术中颅内监测是否必不可少,以及显著影响是否进行颅内记录决策的因素。

方法

在本研究中,招募了连续的MRI阴性的局灶性新皮质癫痫手术患者。所有患者均按照作者所在癫痫中心的专用方案进行常规术前评估,以确定治疗策略。根据手术策略将患者分为两组,即直接手术组和立体定向脑电图(SEEG)引导组。比较两组患者的癫痫病史、发作频率、发作间期和发作期EEG数据、PET数据、PET/MRI配准数据、神经病理学发现及手术结果。进行多变量分析以确定影响进行SEEG监测决策的因素。

结果

本研究纳入64例患者,其中19例和45例分别接受了直接手术和SEEG引导下的皮质切除术。术后平均随访3.9年,56例患者(87.5%)达到Engel I级结果,且无永久性神经功能缺损。直接手术组和SEEG引导组的手术结果无显著差异(94.7%对84.4%)。所有患者均检测到PET代谢减低异常。两组在代谢减低范围(局灶性与非局灶性,p<0.01)和病理亚型(II型局灶性皮质发育不良与其他类型,p=0.03)方面存在显著差异。多变量分析显示,代谢减低范围(比值比0.01,95%可信区间0.00-0.15;p=0.001)是影响治疗策略的唯一独立因素。

结论

仔细选择MRI阴性的新皮质癫痫患者,在不进行颅内监测的情况下直接进行皮质切除术后可能会取得良好的效果。PET/MRI配准在这些患者的术前评估及后续切除中起着至关重要的作用。如果局灶性代谢减低区域与症状学和头皮EEG结果一致,则颅内监测并非手术的必要要求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验