Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stellenbosch University, P O Box 241, 8000, Cape Town, South Africa.
SAMRC/UP Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa.
Placenta. 2022 Nov;129:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Autopsy is regarded as the "gold standard" to determine probable causes of stillbirths. However, autopsy is expensive and not readily available in low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, we assessed how the clinical cause of death is modified by adding placental histology and autopsy findings.
Data from the Safe Passage Study was used where 7060 pregnant women were followed prospectively. Following a stillbirth, each case was discussed and classified at weekly perinatal mortality meetings. This classification was later adapted to the WHO ICD PM system. Clinical information was presented first, and a possible cause of death decided upon and noted. The placental histology was then presented and, again, a possible cause of death, using the placental and clinical information, was decided upon and noted, followed by autopsy information. Diagnoses were then compared to determine how often the additional information changed the initial clinical findings.
Clinical information, placental histology, and autopsy results were available in 47 stillbirths. There were major amendments from the clinical only diagnoses when placental histology was added. Forty cases were classified as due to M1: complications of placenta, cord, and membranes, when placental histology was added compared to 7 cases with clinical classification only, and M5: No maternal condition identified decreased from 30 cases to 3 cases. Autopsy findings confirmed the clinical and placental histology findings.
Clinical information together with examination of the placenta revealed sufficient information to diagnose the most probable cause of death in 40 of 47 cases of stillbirth (85%).
尸检被认为是确定死胎可能原因的“金标准”。然而,尸检费用昂贵,在中低收入国家并不普及。因此,我们评估了通过添加胎盘组织病理学和尸检结果,临床死因是如何改变的。
使用 Safe Passage 研究的数据,对 7060 名孕妇进行前瞻性随访。死胎发生后,每周在围产儿死亡会议上对每个病例进行讨论和分类。后来,这种分类被改编为世界卫生组织 ICD PM 系统。首先介绍临床信息,并确定可能的死因并记录下来。然后介绍胎盘组织病理学,并使用胎盘和临床信息再次确定可能的死因并记录下来,然后是尸检信息。然后将诊断结果进行比较,以确定额外信息改变初始临床发现的频率。
47 例死胎中有临床信息、胎盘组织病理学和尸检结果。当添加胎盘组织病理学时,与仅基于临床的诊断相比,有 40 例被归类为 M1:胎盘、脐带和胎膜并发症,而仅基于临床的诊断有 7 例,M5:未发现母体疾病从 30 例减少到 3 例。尸检结果证实了临床和胎盘组织病理学的发现。
临床信息加上胎盘检查提供了足够的信息,可以在 47 例死胎中的 40 例(85%)中诊断出最可能的死因。