Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Muscle Nerve. 2022 Nov;66(5):545-551. doi: 10.1002/mus.27708. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a chronic immune-mediated peripheral form of polyneuropathy. No reliable diagnostic biomarkers are available by which to make the diagnosis of CIDP. As a result, diagnosis of the condition can be challenging. Many patients are not recognized early in the disease course, and on the other end of the spectrum both establishing early and accurate diagnosis as well as avoiding misdiagnosis and overtreatment. Identification of the hallmark clinical, electrophysiological, and laboratory features of the disease are critical to facilitate rapid diagnosis, while an understanding of diagnostic pitfalls can help prevent misdiagnosis. Since the original description of CIDP in the 1970s, over 15 sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed. The criteria published in 2021 by the European Academy of Neurology / Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) were developed for use during routine clinical care and are available in the public domain. These criteria provide clinicians with an invaluable resource by which the data collected during the evaluation of the patient with possible CIDP can be interpreted. One point of importance that bridges diagnosis to treatment is objectification of the treatment response. Interpretation of how patients respond to treatment drives both long-term treatment paradigms and the diagnosis at which these treatments are aimed. Although no approach is perfect, utilization of strength impairment and disability outcomes in clinical practice can help unravel the difficulties in interpreting response to treatment. Just as improvement in these outcomes is considered diagnostically supportive, the absence of objective benefit argues against it and should prompt reconsideration of a CIDP diagnosis.
慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)是一种慢性免疫介导的周围形式的多发性神经病。目前尚无可靠的诊断生物标志物可用于诊断 CIDP。因此,CIDP 的诊断具有一定挑战性。许多患者在疾病早期未被识别,而在疾病的两端,早期和准确地诊断以及避免误诊和过度治疗都很重要。确定疾病的标志性临床、电生理和实验室特征对于促进快速诊断至关重要,而了解诊断陷阱有助于防止误诊。自 20 世纪 70 年代首次描述 CIDP 以来,已经提出了超过 15 套诊断标准。2021 年由欧洲神经病学会/周围神经学会(EAN/PNS)发布的标准是为常规临床护理而制定的,并在公共领域提供。这些标准为临床医生提供了宝贵的资源,可用于解释在评估可能患有 CIDP 的患者时收集的数据。将诊断与治疗联系起来的一个重要要点是治疗反应的客观化。患者对治疗的反应的解释既影响长期治疗模式,也影响这些治疗的目标诊断。虽然没有一种方法是完美的,但在临床实践中利用力量损伤和残疾结果可以帮助阐明对治疗反应的解释困难。正如这些结果的改善被认为具有诊断支持性一样,缺乏客观益处也对此提出了质疑,并应促使重新考虑 CIDP 的诊断。