Yang Lihua, Ma Qi, Liu Hongfu
School of Government, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, 100871, China.
School of Public Administration, Beihang University, No. 37 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing, 100191, China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116291. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
Environmental conflicts frequently occur in grassland areas, which form the largest terrestrial ecosystem in China. Grassland conflict not only seriously affects environmental and public governance, but also threatens social stability and economic development. Based on a field study using surveys and interviews with 5,490 respondents and a case study of 30 cases in northern China, this paper explores the reasons for and resolution approaches to environmental conflict in grassland areas and identified three key findings. First, the reasons for conflict included economic, political and administrative, technological, social, cultural, and historical factors. Economic and political and administrative factors were confirmed as the most important causes of such conflict. Although economic reasons were often deemed more important than political and administrative ones, they always played a preconditioning role. Political and administrative causes often directly led to the outbreak and deterioration of conflict. Second, although multiple approaches have been used to resolve conflicts in grassland areas, governmental intervention and mediation remain the most strongly recognized and widely used approach. The importance of judicial settlement has increased significantly in contemporary practices. Third, both the reasons for and approaches adopted to mitigate conflict affected the effectiveness of the conflict resolution, and the reasons also influenced the selection of appropriate conflict resolution approaches. These findings provide a new theoretical direction for future studies as well as practical implications for resolving conflicts in environmental and other types of public governance in contemporary China and elsewhere.
环境冲突在草原地区频繁发生,而草原地区构成了中国最大的陆地生态系统。草原冲突不仅严重影响环境和公共治理,还威胁到社会稳定和经济发展。基于一项对5490名受访者进行调查和访谈的实地研究以及对中国北方30个案例的案例研究,本文探讨了草原地区环境冲突的原因及解决方法,并得出了三个关键发现。第一,冲突的原因包括经济、政治与行政、技术、社会、文化和历史因素。经济以及政治与行政因素被确认为此类冲突的最重要原因。尽管经济原因通常被认为比政治和行政原因更重要,但它们始终起到前提条件的作用。政治和行政原因往往直接导致冲突的爆发和恶化。第二,尽管已采用多种方法来解决草原地区的冲突,但政府干预和调解仍然是最受认可且使用最广泛的方法。在当代实践中,司法解决的重要性已显著增加。第三,冲突的原因和为缓解冲突所采用的方法都影响冲突解决的有效性,而且原因也影响适当冲突解决方法的选择。这些发现为未来研究提供了新的理论方向,并对当代中国及其他地区解决环境和其他类型公共治理中的冲突具有实际意义。