Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Department of Radiotherapy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Hepatol Int. 2022 Dec;16(6):1368-1378. doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10423-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
To compare survival outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) prior to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) (RT + TACE) with TACE followed with RT (TACE + RT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).
A randomized controlled study was conducted from August 2016 to December 2019 on patients with unresectable HCC and PVTT. The patients were randomly assigned to RT + TACE group or TACE + RT group in a 1:1 ratio. Evaluation of therapeutic effects on the primary tumor was based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), while that on PVTT was based on the changing of Cheng's PVTT classification. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS).
The 120 patients who entered this study were evenly assigned to two groups. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the OS rates for RT + TACE group at 1, 2 and 3 years were 61.7%, 27.4% and 15.6%, compared with 45.0%, 16.1% and 4.7% in TACE + RT group. The median OS was increased in patients with RT + TACE compared with those who had TACE + RT with a marginally significance (15.4 versus 11.5 months, HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-1.01, p = 0.054). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in RT + TACE group was 6.6 months versus 4.2 months in TACE + RT group (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.030). The corresponding disease control rate (DCR) at 3 months was 86.7% versus 66.7% (p = 0.017) and 61.7% versus 46.7% (p = 0.099) at 6 months. In subgroup analyses, RT + TACE was associated with better OS (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.33-0.99, p = 0.048) and PFS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.33-0.93, p = 0.026) versus TACE + RT among patients with type III/IV PVTT. There were 3 patients in RT + TACE group and 2 in TACE + RT group had adverse events ≥ grade 3.
Applying RT prior to TACE provided better survival outcomes than TACE followed by RT for patients with HCC and PVTT, which may act as an optimized regional modality to further improve local control rates (Trial registration: ChiCTR ChiCTR2000033573.).
本研究旨在比较经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)前放疗(RT)(RT+TACE)与 TACE 后放疗(TACE+RT)在不能切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)合并门静脉癌栓(PVTT)患者中的生存结局。
2016 年 8 月至 2019 年 12 月,我们对不能切除的 HCC 合并 PVTT 患者进行了一项随机对照研究。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配至 RT+TACE 组或 TACE+RT 组。根据实体瘤反应评价标准(mRECIST)评价原发肿瘤的治疗效果,根据程氏 PVTT 分级标准评价 PVTT 的变化。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。
本研究共纳入 120 例患者,按意向治疗(ITT)人群分析,RT+TACE 组的 1、2 和 3 年 OS 率分别为 61.7%、27.4%和 15.6%,TACE+RT 组分别为 45.0%、16.1%和 4.7%。RT+TACE 组患者的中位 OS 明显长于 TACE+RT 组(15.4 个月比 11.5 个月,HR=0.68,95%CI 0.46-1.01,p=0.054)。RT+TACE 组中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 6.6 个月,TACE+RT 组为 4.2 个月(HR=0.66,95%CI 0.46-0.96,p=0.030)。3 个月时的疾病控制率(DCR)分别为 86.7%和 66.7%(p=0.017),6 个月时分别为 61.7%和 46.7%(p=0.099)。亚组分析显示,与 TACE+RT 相比,RT+TACE 组患者的 OS(HR,0.48;95%CI 0.33-0.99,p=0.048)和 PFS(HR,0.55;95%CI 0.33-0.93,p=0.026)均较好。RT+TACE 组有 3 例患者和 TACE+RT 组有 2 例患者发生≥3 级不良事件。
对于 HCC 合并 PVTT 患者,TACE 前应用 RT 较 TACE 后应用 RT 可获得更好的生存结局,这可能是一种优化的区域治疗方法,可进一步提高局部控制率(临床试验注册:ChiCTR ChiCTR2000033573.)。