Caturegli Giorgio, Kapoor Shrey, Ponomarev Vladimir, Kim Bo Soo, Whitman Glenn J R, Ziai Wendy, Cho Sung-Min
Division of Neurosciences Critical Care, Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Aug 20;15:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.07.026. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) carries a high morbidity of acute brain injury (ABI) with resultant mortality increase. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) allows real-time characterization of regional cerebral hemodynamics, but limited data exist on the interpretation of microembolic signals (MES) in ECMO.
This prospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care center, November 2017 through February 2022, and included all adult patients receiving venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) ECMO undergoing TCD examinations, which all included MES monitoring.
Of 145 patients on ECMO who underwent at least 1 TCD examination, 100 (68.9%) patients on VA-ECMO received 187 examinations whereas 45 (31.1%) patients on VV-ECMO received 65 examinations ( = .81). MES were observed in 35 (35.0%) patients on VA-ECMO and 2 (4.7%) patients on VV-ECMO ( < .001), corresponding to 46 (24.6%) and 2 (3.1%) TCD examinations, respectively. MES were present in 29.4% of patients on VA-ECMO without additional cardiac support, compared with 38.1% with intra-aortic balloon pump and 57.1% with left ventricular assist device, but these differences were not statistically significant ( = .39; = .20, respectively). Presence or number of MES was not associated with VA-ECMO cannulation mode (23.4% MES presence in peripheral cannulation vs 25.8% in central cannulation, = .80). In both VA- and VV-ECMO, MES presence or number was not associated with presence of clot or fibrin in the ECMO circuit or with any studied hemodynamic, laboratory, or ECMO parameters at the time of TCD. ABI occurred in 38% and 31.1% of patients on VA- and VV-ECMO, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, neither ABI nor a composite outcome of arterial thromboembolic events was associated with presence or number of MES in VA- ECMO.
TCD analysis in a large cohort of patients on ECMO demonstrates a significant number of MES, especially in patients on VA-ECMO with intra-aortic balloon pump, and/or left ventricular assist device. However, clinical associations and significance of TCD MES remain unresolved and warrant further correlation with systematic imaging and long-term neurologic follow-up.
体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)导致急性脑损伤(ABI)的发病率很高,进而增加死亡率。经颅多普勒(TCD)可实时表征局部脑血流动力学,但关于ECMO中微栓子信号(MES)解读的数据有限。
这项前瞻性队列研究于2017年11月至2022年2月在一家三级医疗中心进行,纳入了所有接受静脉-动脉(VA)和静脉-静脉(VV)ECMO并接受TCD检查的成年患者,所有检查均包括MES监测。
在145例接受至少1次TCD检查的ECMO患者中,100例(68.9%)接受VA-ECMO的患者接受了187次检查,而45例(31.1%)接受VV-ECMO的患者接受了65次检查(P = 0.81)。在接受VA-ECMO的患者中有35例(35.0%)观察到MES,接受VV-ECMO的患者中有2例(4.7%)观察到MES(P < 0.001),分别对应46次(24.6%)和2次(3.1%)TCD检查。在没有额外心脏支持的VA-ECMO患者中,29.4%存在MES;相比之下,使用主动脉内球囊泵的患者中这一比例为38.1%,使用左心室辅助装置的患者中为57.1%,但这些差异无统计学意义(P分别为0.39和0.20)。MES的存在或数量与VA-ECMO插管模式无关(外周插管中MES存在率为23.4%,中心插管中为25.8%,P = 0.80)。在VA-ECMO和VV-ECMO中,MES的存在或数量均与ECMO回路中是否存在血栓或纤维蛋白无关,也与TCD检查时任何研究的血流动力学、实验室或ECMO参数无关。接受VA-ECMO和VV-ECMO的患者中,ABI的发生率分别为38%和31.1%。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,无论是ABI还是动脉血栓栓塞事件的复合结局均与VA-ECMO中MES的存在或数量无关。
对大量接受ECMO治疗的患者进行TCD分析发现,存在大量MES,尤其是在使用主动脉内球囊泵和/或左心室辅助装置的VA-ECMO患者中。然而,TCD MES的临床关联和意义仍未明确,需要进一步与系统成像和长期神经学随访进行关联研究。