Jiang Shiqi, Lin Xinyue, Qi Lingli, Zhang Yongqiang, Sharp Basil
School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Energy Center, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Econ Anal Policy. 2022 Dec;76:981-996. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
The outbreak and ongoing evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic have dramatically impacted economic development and CO emissions. China is under simultaneous pressure to recover from the outbreak and meet its carbon reduction targets, and the government is endeavouring to stimulate economic recovery through fiscal and monetary policies. This paper uses a computable general equilibrium model to measure the impact on China's economic recovery and carbon emissions by incorporating the pandemic shock and related economic recovery policies of loan prime rate (LPR) and value-added tax (VAT) reduction. The study found that COVID-19 led to a simultaneous shock on China's supply and demand sides in which GDP dropped by 2.62% and carbon emissions fell by 2.53%, compared to the period prior to COVID-19. Although the LPR and VAT reduction effectively mitigated economic loss, the combined LPR and VAT reduction had a more substantial effect on boosting GDP than the single policies. The VAT cut expands production and was used to overcome supply-side shocks, while lowering LPR mitigates the damage of demand-side shocks. Compared to the VAT reduction policy, reduced LPR has smaller carbon emissions per unit of GDP output. Consequently, we recommend that the government concentrate on a combination of policies to navigate pandemic shocks, as the two economic stimulus policies are confirmed to complement one another in terms of strengths and shortcomings.
新冠疫情的爆发及持续演变对经济发展和碳排放产生了巨大影响。中国同时面临着从疫情中复苏以及实现碳减排目标的压力,政府正努力通过财政和货币政策刺激经济复苏。本文运用可计算一般均衡模型,通过纳入疫情冲击以及贷款市场报价利率(LPR)下调和增值税(VAT)减免等相关经济复苏政策,来衡量其对中国经济复苏和碳排放的影响。研究发现,与新冠疫情之前的时期相比,新冠疫情对中国的供需两侧同时造成冲击,国内生产总值(GDP)下降了2.62%,碳排放下降了2.53%。尽管LPR下调和增值税减免有效减轻了经济损失,但LPR下调与增值税减免相结合对推动GDP增长的效果比单一政策更为显著。增值税减免扩大了生产,用于克服供给侧冲击,而LPR下调则减轻了需求侧冲击的损害。与增值税减免政策相比,LPR下调每单位GDP产出的碳排放量更小。因此,我们建议政府专注于采取政策组合来应对疫情冲击,因为这两项经济刺激政策在优缺点方面相互补充已得到证实。