Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Department of Emergency Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Apr;37(2):351-363. doi: 10.1177/08971900221134551. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
To evaluate practitioner use of ketamine and identify potential barriers to use in acutely and critically ill patients. To compare characteristics, beliefs, and practices of ketamine frequent users and non-users. An online survey developed by members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Section was distributed to physician, pharmacist, nurse practitioner, physician assistant and nurse members of SCCM. The online survey queried SCCM members on self-reported practices regarding ketamine use and potential barriers in acute and critically ill patients. Respondents, 341 analyzed, were mostly adult physicians, practicing in the United States at academic medical centers. Clinicians were comfortable or very comfortable using ketamine to facilitate intubation (80.0%), for analgesia (77.9%), procedural sedation (79.4%), continuous ICU sedation (65.8%), dressing changes (62.4%), or for asthma exacerbation and status epilepticus (58.8% and 40.4%). Clinicians were least comfortable with ketamine use for alcohol withdrawal and opioid detoxification (24.7% and 23.2%). Most respondents reported "never" or "infrequently" using ketamine preferentially for continuous IV analgesia (55.6%) or sedation (61%). Responses were mixed across dosing ranges and duration. The most common barriers to ketamine use were adverse effects (42.6%), other practitioners not routinely using the medication (41.5%), lack of evidence (33.5%), lack of familiarity (33.1%), and hospital/institutional policy guiding the indication for use (32.3%). Although most critical care practitioners report feeling comfortable using ketamine, there are many inconsistencies in practice regarding dose, duration, and reasons to avoid or limit ketamine use. Further educational tools may be targeted at practitioners to improve appropriate ketamine use.
评估从业者对氯胺酮的使用情况,并确定在急性和危重病患者中使用氯胺酮的潜在障碍。比较氯胺酮频繁使用者和非使用者的特征、信念和实践。由危重病医学会(SCCM)临床药学和药理学分会成员开发的在线调查分发给 SCCM 的医生、药剂师、护士从业者、医师助理和护士成员。在线调查询问了 SCCM 成员关于他们在急性和危重病患者中使用氯胺酮的自我报告实践和潜在障碍。 分析了 341 名受访者,他们主要是在美国学术医疗中心执业的成年医生。临床医生在使用氯胺酮辅助插管时感到舒适或非常舒适(80.0%),用于镇痛(77.9%)、程序镇静(79.4%)、持续 ICU 镇静(65.8%)、换药(62.4%)或用于哮喘加重和癫痫持续状态(58.8%和 40.4%)。临床医生最不舒适使用氯胺酮治疗酒精戒断和阿片类药物解毒(24.7%和 23.2%)。大多数受访者报告“从未”或“很少”优先使用氯胺酮用于持续静脉内镇痛(55.6%)或镇静(61%)。在剂量范围和持续时间方面,回答存在差异。氯胺酮使用的最常见障碍是不良反应(42.6%)、其他从业者不常规使用该药物(41.5%)、缺乏证据(33.5%)、缺乏熟悉程度(33.1%)和医院/机构政策指导使用指征(32.3%)。 尽管大多数重症监护从业者报告使用氯胺酮感到舒适,但在剂量、持续时间和避免或限制氯胺酮使用的原因方面,实践存在许多不一致之处。可能需要进一步的教育工具来提高适当使用氯胺酮的水平。