Suppr超能文献

IDS公司新型粪便钙卫蛋白检测法:验证及与DiaSorin方法的比较

New Faecal Calprotectin Assay by IDS: Validation and Comparison to DiaSorin Method.

作者信息

Castiglione Vincent, Berodes Maëlle, Lukas Pierre, Louis Edouard, Cavalier Etienne, Lutteri Laurence

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry, CHU Sart-Tilman, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Sart-Tilman, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;12(10):2338. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102338.

Abstract

Background: The faecal calprotectin (FC) measurement is used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosis and follow-up. The aim of this study was to validate for the first time the new IDS FC extraction device and immunoassay kit, and to compare it with the DiaSorin test in patients with and without IBD. Methods: First, the precision of the IDS assay and its stability were assessed. Then, 379 stool extracts were analysed with the IDS kit on iSYS and compared with a DiaSorin Liaison XL assay. Results: The intra- and inter-assay CVs did not exceed 5%. The stool samples were stable up to 4 weeks at −20 °C. Lot-to-lot comparison showed a good correlation (Lot1 = 1.06 × Lot2 + 0.60; p > 0.05). The Passing and Bablok regression showed no significant deviation from linearity between the two methods (IDS = 1.06 × DiaSorin − 0.6; p > 0.05; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.93). According to the recommended cut-offs, the IDS assay identified more IBD and irritable bowel syndrome patients than DiaSorin, which had more borderline results (16 vs. 20%, respectively). Conclusions: The IDS faecal calprotectin had good analytical validation parameters. Compared to the DiaSorin method, it showed comparable results, but slightly outperformed it in the identification of more IBD patients and active disease.

摘要

背景

粪便钙卫蛋白(FC)检测用于炎症性肠病(IBD)的诊断和随访。本研究的目的是首次验证新型IDS FC提取装置和免疫分析试剂盒,并将其与DiaSorin检测方法在IBD患者和非IBD患者中进行比较。方法:首先,评估IDS检测方法的精密度及其稳定性。然后,使用iSYS上的IDS试剂盒对379份粪便提取物进行分析,并与DiaSorin Liaison XL检测方法进行比较。结果:批内和批间变异系数均未超过5%。粪便样本在−20°C下可稳定保存4周。批次间比较显示出良好的相关性(批次1 = 1.06×批次2 + 0.60;p>0.05)。Passing和Bablok回归分析表明,两种方法之间无显著的线性偏差(IDS = 1.06×DiaSorin − 0.6;p>0.05;一致性相关系数 = 0.93)。根据推荐的临界值,IDS检测方法比DiaSorin检测方法识别出更多的IBD和肠易激综合征患者,DiaSorin检测方法的临界结果更多(分别为16%和20%)。结论:IDS粪便钙卫蛋白具有良好的分析验证参数。与DiaSorin方法相比,它显示出可比的结果,但在识别更多IBD患者和活动性疾病方面略胜一筹。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4983/9600005/6e405a88f739/diagnostics-12-02338-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验