Suppr超能文献

在某些存在诊断脑死亡时可能出现假阳性或假阴性结论风险的情况下进行计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)。

Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) in Selected Scenarios with Risk of Possible False-Positive or False-Negative Conclusions in Diagnosing Brain Death.

作者信息

Schwarz Gerhard, Errath Maximilian, Argüelles Delgado Placido, Wießpeiner Ulrike, Voit-Augustin Henrika, Grims Robert, Kaltenböck Friedrich, Kober Eva Maria, Schöpfer Andreas, Fuchs Gottfried

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, A-8036 Graz, Austria.

Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, A-8036 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 6;12(10):1551. doi: 10.3390/life12101551.

Abstract

It is widely accepted that brain death (BD) is a diagnosis based on clinical examination. However, false-positive and false-negative evaluation results may be serious limitations. Ancillary tests are used when there is uncertainty about the reliability of the neurologic examination. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an ancillary test that tends to have the lowest false-positive rates. However, there are various influencing factors that can have an unfavorable effect on the validity of the examination method. There are inconsistent protocols regarding the evaluation criteria such as scoring systems. Among the most widely used different scoring systems the 4-point CTA-scoring system has been accepted as the most reliable method. Appropriate timing and/or Doppler pre-testing could reduce the number of possible premature examinations and increase the sensitivity of CTA in diagnosing cerebral circulatory arrest (CCA). In some cases of inconclusive CTA, the whole brain computed tomography perfusion (CTP) could be a crucial adjunct. Due to the increasing significance of CTA/CTP in determining BD, the methodology (including benefits and limitations) should also be conveyed via innovative electronic training tools, such as the BRAINDEXweb teaching tool based on an expert system.

摘要

人们普遍认为脑死亡(BD)是基于临床检查的诊断。然而,假阳性和假阴性的评估结果可能是严重的局限性。当神经学检查的可靠性存在不确定性时,会使用辅助检查。计算机断层血管造影(CTA)是一种辅助检查,其假阳性率往往最低。然而,有多种影响因素可能会对检查方法的有效性产生不利影响。关于评估标准,如评分系统,存在不一致的方案。在最广泛使用的不同评分系统中,4分CTA评分系统已被公认为最可靠的方法。适当的时机和/或多普勒预测试可以减少可能过早检查的次数,并提高CTA诊断脑循环停止(CCA)的敏感性。在某些CTA结果不确定的情况下,全脑计算机断层灌注(CTP)可能是关键的辅助手段。由于CTA/CTP在确定脑死亡方面的重要性日益增加,其方法(包括益处和局限性)也应通过创新的电子培训工具进行传达,例如基于专家系统的BRAINDEXweb教学工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d55/9604663/bb671ed5b95e/life-12-01551-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验