Yang Jingyuan, Qu Yi, Zhao Jianchun, Cong Jingwu, Sun Zixi, Du Yunfeng, Yang Gang, Ding Dayong, Chen Youxin, Cheng Gangwei
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;9:990611. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.990611. eCollection 2022.
To investigate whether stereoscopic vs. monoscopic viewing condition influences the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood in a general ophthalmologist population from multicenters on a cloud-based platform.
A cross-sectional study of 519 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs of optic discs with adequate quality were selected and presented using a cloud-based platform. A total of 21 general ophthalmologists from 14 centers assessed 15 morphologic features based on 5R's rules and estimated glaucoma likelihood for each assigned photograph. There were 93 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs evaluated by a panel of glaucoma specialists and set as ground truth. The main outcome measures were the agreement between estimates and ground truth and the inter-grader agreements.
There were good agreements between ground truth and both monoscopic and stereoscopic estimates (stereo κ 0.532 and mono κ 0.494). There was also a substantial intra-grader agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic evaluation of glaucoma likelihood (κ 0.636). In eyes with probable glaucoma, the accuracy of the stereo method was greater than that of the mono method (stereo 0.238 vs. mono 0.118) When compared with ground truth, stereoscopic photographs had a better agreement for disc size (stereo κ 0.447 vs. mono κ 0.183), disc color (stereo κ 0.612 vs. mono κ 0.549), neuroretinal rim shape (stereo κ 0.356 vs. mono κ 0.274) on the whole. The stereoscopic method also had a better inter-grade agreement for disc size, disc color, neuroretinal rim shape, and glaucoma likelihood (stereo κ 0.402 vs. mono κ 0.359) on the whole.
In the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood, the stereoscopic method showed superiority compared to the monoscopic method for general ophthalmologists. The stereoscopic method is more likely to identify glaucomatous eyes which need medical intervention.
在基于云平台的多中心普通眼科医生群体中,研究立体视觉与单眼视觉条件是否会影响对视盘照片形态特征及青光眼患病可能性的评估。
选取519对质量合格的视盘立体照片和单眼照片,并通过基于云的平台展示。来自14个中心的21名普通眼科医生根据5R规则评估15项形态特征,并估计每张分配照片的青光眼患病可能性。一组青光眼专家评估了93对视盘立体照片和单眼照片,并将其作为基准真值。主要观察指标为估计值与基准真值之间的一致性以及分级者之间的一致性。
基准真值与单眼及立体视觉估计值之间均具有良好的一致性(立体视觉κ值为0.532,单眼视觉κ值为0.494)。单眼和立体视觉对青光眼患病可能性的评估在分级者内部也具有较高的一致性(κ值为0.636)。在可能患有青光眼的眼中,立体视觉方法的准确性高于单眼视觉方法(立体视觉为0.238,单眼视觉为0.118)。与基准真值相比,立体照片在视盘大小(立体视觉κ值为0.447,单眼视觉κ值为0.183)、视盘颜色(立体视觉κ值为0.612,单眼视觉κ值为0.549)、神经视网膜边缘形状(立体视觉κ值为0.356,单眼视觉κ值为0.274)方面总体上具有更好的一致性。立体视觉方法在视盘大小、视盘颜色、神经视网膜边缘形状和青光眼患病可能性方面总体上也具有更好的分级者间一致性(立体视觉κ值为0.402,单眼视觉κ值为0.359)。
在对视盘照片的形态特征和青光眼患病可能性进行评估时,对于普通眼科医生而言,立体视觉方法相较于单眼视觉方法具有优越性。立体视觉方法更有可能识别出需要医学干预的青光眼患者。