Bioethicist in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
Qualitative researcher in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Nov;44(6):14-22. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500147.
Investigators commonly offer payments to research participants to promote recruitment and retention. Yet the ethics of offering monetary incentives to research participants continues to be debated. Prior conceptual work has addressed some of these concerns; there is, however, also a need for empirical evidence to understand the effects of payment on participants. Here, we report the results of a qualitative study comprising (1) discourse analysis of recruitment conversations between study coordinators and potential participants for an actual clinical trial and (2) semistructured interviews with participants addressing the effects of an incentive on their decision-making. Many participants reported that money had been a motivation for enrolling in the clinical trial but did not use reasoning that suggested undue influence or unjust inducement. These findings add to a growing body of literature suggesting that payment is an ethically acceptable tool for promoting recruitment and retention in clinical trials.
研究人员通常会向研究参与者提供报酬,以促进招募和保留。然而,向研究参与者提供金钱激励的道德问题仍在争论中。先前的概念性工作已经解决了其中的一些问题;然而,也需要实证证据来了解支付对参与者的影响。在这里,我们报告了一项定性研究的结果,该研究包括(1)对实际临床试验中研究协调员和潜在参与者之间的招募对话进行话语分析,以及(2)对参与者进行半结构化访谈,以了解激励对他们决策的影响。许多参与者报告说,金钱是他们参加临床试验的动机,但他们并没有使用暗示不当影响或不正当诱因的推理。这些发现增加了越来越多的文献,表明支付是促进临床试验招募和保留的一种道德上可接受的工具。