Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析:英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的应答丧失和需要剂量递增。

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Loss of Response and Need for Dose Escalation of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Oct 3;29(10):1633-1647. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac200.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loss of response to infliximab or adalimumab in ulcerative colitis occurs frequently, and dose escalation may aid in regaining clinical benefit. This study aimed to systematically assess the annual loss of response and dose escalation rates for infliximab and adalimumab in ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted from August 1999 to July 2021 for studies reporting loss of response and dose escalation during infliximab and/or adalimumab use in ulcerative colitis patients with primary response. Annual loss of response, dose escalation rates, and clinical benefit after dose escalation were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies with 1-year follow-up or less.

RESULTS

We included 50 unique studies assessing loss of response (infliximab, n = 24; adalimumab, n = 21) or dose escalation (infliximab, n = 21; adalimumab, n = 16). The pooled annual loss of response for infliximab was 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-14.3) and 13.6% (95% CI, 9.3-19.9) for studies with 1-year follow-up. The pooled annual loss of response for adalimumab was 13.4% (95% CI, 8.2-21.8) and 23.3% (95% CI, 15.4-35.1) for studies with 1-year follow-up. Annual pooled dose escalation rates were 13.8% (95% CI, 8.7-21.7) for infliximab and 21.3% (95% CI, 14.4-31.3) for adalimumab, regaining clinical benefit in 72.4% and 52.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual loss of response was 10% for infliximab and 13% for adalimumab, with higher rates during the first year. Annual dose escalation rates were 14% (infliximab) and 21% (adalimumab), with clinical benefit in 72% and 52%, respectively. Uniform definitions are needed to facilitate more robust evaluations.

摘要

背景

溃疡性结肠炎患者对英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗的应答丧失较为常见,增加剂量可能有助于重新获得临床获益。本研究旨在系统评估溃疡性结肠炎患者使用英夫利昔单抗和/或阿达木单抗时应答丧失和增加剂量的年度发生率。

方法

从 1999 年 8 月至 2021 年 7 月,我们对报告了原发性应答的溃疡性结肠炎患者使用英夫利昔单抗和/或阿达木单抗时应答丧失和增加剂量的研究进行了系统检索。计算了年度应答丧失率、剂量增加率以及增加剂量后的临床获益。对随访时间少于 1 年的研究进行了亚组分析。

结果

我们纳入了 50 项评估应答丧失(英夫利昔单抗,n=24;阿达木单抗,n=21)或剂量增加(英夫利昔单抗,n=21;阿达木单抗,n=16)的研究。英夫利昔单抗的年度应答丧失率为 10.1%(95%置信区间[CI],7.1%-14.3%),随访 1 年的研究中为 13.6%(95% CI,9.3%-19.9%)。阿达木单抗的年度应答丧失率为 13.4%(95% CI,8.2%-21.8%),随访 1 年的研究中为 23.3%(95% CI,15.4%-35.1%)。英夫利昔单抗的年度剂量增加率为 13.8%(95% CI,8.7%-21.7%),阿达木单抗为 21.3%(95% CI,14.4%-31.3%),分别有 72.4%和 52.3%的患者获得了临床获益。

结论

英夫利昔单抗的年度应答丧失率为 10%,阿达木单抗为 13%,第一年的丧失率更高。英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的年度剂量增加率分别为 14%和 21%,分别有 72%和 52%的患者获得了临床获益。需要统一的定义以促进更有力的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04e1/10547237/6cfa89e781c2/izac200_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验